On 10/22/2016 02:08 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
You're welcome. Please note that the reuse mechanism is not perfect and
can still be improved. So do not hesitate to report any issue you find,
we definitely need real-world feedback like this. I cannot promise that
every issue will be fixed, but at
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:50:20PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> thank you, I tried the inspect-delay again and this alone seems to fix
> things at least for the curl tests so Chad was indeed right but I might
> have forgotten to restart HAProxy when I tested this the first time.
This
On 22.10.2016 00:08, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 09:09:39PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> So after more experimenting I got things to work properly when I move
>> the "limited_path" acl check from the "tcp-request content" directive to
>> the
Hi Gabriele,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're having a problem with version 1.5.14 of haproxy, packaged for
> CentOS 7, but it seems even the code in master is affected.
>
> In situations where bind is not possible (in our case, the address was
>
Hi Pavlos,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > I'm not surprized that always works better, but my point is that if it's
> > much better it can be useful to stay with it, but if it's only 1% better
> > it's not worth it.
> >
>
> It is way better:-), see Marcin's
5 matches
Mail list logo
