Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:35:13PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > I return true if the largest network contains the smaller. The order of > networks are not important. > > I wrote this code a long time ago, I'm not remember exactly. Maybe I > wrote bullshit. > > I write this code

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 22:04:57 +0100 Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:50:53PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:07:07 +0100 > > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:54:47PM +0100,

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:50:53PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:07:07 +0100 > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:54:47PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org > > wrote: > > > Thanks ! Willy, can you apply the patch ? > > >

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:54:47PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > Thanks ! Willy, can you apply the patch ? Done, thanks guys. However Thierry my previous question still stands : what *real* type of test is this supposed to validate ? Because in my opinion this test consisting in

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

Thanks ! Willy, can you apply the patch ? On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:47:10 +0300 Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > On 23 Dec 2016, at 19:07, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > > > > Ok, thanks Willy. > > > > The news path in attachment. David, can you test the FreeBSD

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

> On 23 Dec 2016, at 19:07, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > > Ok, thanks Willy. > > The news path in attachment. David, can you test the FreeBSD build ? > The patch is tested and validated for Linux. Yes, it does fix FreeBSD build. > > Thierry > > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:50:38

Re: Haproxy 1.7 and Ipv6-only hosts

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:21:57PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > (...) > > The problem is that in order not > > to lose the port which was already parsed, we temporarily set the family to > > AF_INET and store

Re: Haproxy 1.7 and Ipv6-only hosts

Hi Baptiste, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: (...) > The problem is that in order not > to lose the port which was already parsed, we temporarily set the family to > AF_INET and store the port in the sockaddr. The problem is that by doing so > we lose the initial

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

Ok, thanks Willy. The news path in attachment. David, can you test the FreeBSD build ? The patch is tested and validated for Linux. Thierry On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:50:38 +0100 Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:37:13PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: >

Re: Haproxy 1.7 and Ipv6-only hosts

Hi Maksim, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:59:05PM +0300, ?? wrote: > Hi! > > Since I've installed 1.7.1 version of haproxy over 1.6.10 ??? it stopped > working with ipv6-only backends (no A-record in DNS at all, only ), > even with USE_GETADDRINFO=1 set. Haproxy

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: systemd: potential zombie processes

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:44:15PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote: > In systemd mode (-Ds), the master haproxy process is waiting for each > child to exit in a specific order. If a process die when it's not his > turn, it will become a zombie process until every processes exit. (...) Applied,

ssl offloading and send-proxy-v2-ssl

Hi everyone, i'm using a nbproc > 1 configuration for ssl offloading : listen web_tls mode http bind *:443 ssl crt whatever.pem process 2 bind *:443 ssl crt whatever.pem process 3 ../.. server web_plain u...@plain.sock send-proxy-v2-ssl frontend web_plain bind*:80

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:37:13PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > thanks Willy for the idea. I will write a patch ASAP, but. why a 32bits > cast and not a 64 bit cast ? First because existing code uses this already and it works. Second because the 64-bit check might be more

Re: lua support does not build on FreeBSD

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:44:49 +0100 Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi guys, > > so I've looked a little bit at this and can propose something different. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:59:50PM +, David CARLIER wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 14 December 2016 at 14:48,

Haproxy 1.7 and Ipv6-only hosts

Hi! Since I've installed 1.7.1 version of haproxy over 1.6.10 – it stopped working with ipv6-only backends (no A-record in DNS at all, only ), even with USE_GETADDRINFO=1 set. Haproxy says, that it 'could not resolve address' and exits on a parsing phase. The problem is in fuction

Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] nbsrv() behavior when backend is disabled

Hi Willy, On 12/23/2016 12:10 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hmmm I think that makes sense indeed. Just out of curiosity in what > situation did you encounter this condition ? A reload maybe ? We have some business logic which tries to detect if there are any usable members in the backend before