Hi all,
The version of haproxy I use is:
# haproxy -version
HA-Proxy version 1.5.2 2014/07/12
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
I have a question regarding the Health Check. In the documentation of
haproxy, it mentions the below for the "timeout check" and "inter":
For "timeout check":
If
Hi all,
The version of haproxy I use is:
# haproxy -version
HA-Proxy version 1.5.2 2014/07/12
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
I have a question regarding the Health Check. In the documentation of
haproxy, it mentions the below for the "timeout check" and "inter":
For "timeout check":
If
Hi all,
As Willy said, I'm reviewing the internal DNS architecture to make it fully
autonomous and more flexible with a registration mechanism and callbacks
system.
First purpose is to mutualise DNS resources (cache of the response, one
resolution at a time for a query), second is to enable dns re
Le 13/05/2017 à 11:27, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
>> Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and gl
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
> Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
> >> Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc
> >> manage to make it even harder. Especially
Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
>> Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc
>> manage to make it even harder. Especially the timezone global handling
>> which is not thread-safe as you pinpoin
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote:
> Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc
> manage to make it even harder. Especially the timezone global handling
> which is not thread-safe as you pinpointed.
> Anyway, free conding a simple timegm() is not
7 matches
Mail list logo