Re: backend has no server available!

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:28 PM, James Stroehmann < james.stroehm...@proquest.com> wrote: > I had a similar problem, and I believe reducing my ‘hold valid’ setting to > 1s fixed it. > > > > > ​Possible explanation is the "inter" parameter which is by default set to 2s for the "check" operation,

Re: HAProxy fails to compile against BoringSSL since 1.8-rc1

Ah, this stuff moves too quickly! I got it to build with the BoringSSL version in Chrome Beta (63). Thank you for your time! Jamie On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 11:15 Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > > Hi Jamie, > > you need to take a up to date BoringSSL commit ( >

Re: backend has no server available!

I will apply the suggested setting. Any other parameters need to modify or add here. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:58 PM, James Stroehmann < james.stroehm...@proquest.com> wrote: > I had a similar problem, and I believe reducing my ‘hold valid’ setting to > 1s fixed it. > > > > > > *From:* DHAVAL

RE: backend has no server available!

I had a similar problem, and I believe reducing my ‘hold valid’ setting to 1s fixed it. From: DHAVAL JAISWAL [mailto:dhava...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 2:31 AM To: HAproxy Mailing Lists Subject: backend has no server available! [External Email] I had the

Re: option redispatch clarification

Hello, Thank you for taking the time to answer in detail. În ziua de vineri, 10 noiembrie 2017, la 18:24:09 EET, Willy Tarreau a scris: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:05:06PM +0200, Arthur Titeica wrote: > > If this doesn't work is there some other mechanism to achieve something > > like this? >

Re: HAProxy fails to compile against BoringSSL since 1.8-rc1

Hi Jamie, you need to take a up to date BoringSSL commit (https://github.com/JayH5/docker-haproxy-boringssl/blob/master/1.8-dev/Dockerfile#L10) ++ Manu > Le 11 nov. 2017 à 16:32, Jamie Hewland a écrit : > > Hi there, > > I maintain a Docker-based build of HAProxy built