Re: HAproxy ( + UCARP ) in an Active / Passive setup

2018-01-26 Thread Igor Cicimov
On 27 Jan 2018 4:44 pm, "TomK" wrote: On 1/26/2018 7:49 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM, TomK tomk...@mdevsys.com>> wrote: > > Hey All, > > We have UCARP and HAproxy configured and setup between two servers. > HAproxy is bound to the UCARP VIP between th

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: emit warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

2018-01-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:14:03PM +, Christopher Lane wrote: > > I don't know much what to think about such a change to be honnest. What > > valid use case do you have for passing multiple processes as a single > > argument after -sf instead of passing a normal list of arguments ? > > > > We

Re: HAproxy ( + UCARP ) in an Active / Passive setup

2018-01-26 Thread TomK
On 1/26/2018 7:49 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM, TomK > wrote: Hey All, We have UCARP and HAproxy configured and setup between two servers. HAproxy is bound to the UCARP VIP between the nodes. There are four services per h

Re: HAproxy ( + UCARP ) in an Active / Passive setup

2018-01-26 Thread Igor Cicimov
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM, TomK wrote: > Hey All, > > We have UCARP and HAproxy configured and setup between two servers. > HAproxy is bound to the UCARP VIP between the nodes. There are four > services per hoer: four on SRV1 (primary) and same four apps on SRV2 > (secondary) We need activ

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: emit warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

2018-01-26 Thread Christopher Lane
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:52 PM Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:07:03PM +, Christopher Lane wrote: > > Ping; this is a safe change to wanr about a confusing source of error > when > > you don't quote the arguments to haproxy in a "soft reloading new config > a

Layer 7 Routing Capabilities for Non-HTTP Protocol

2018-01-26 Thread Alistair Lowe
Hello all, I'm looking to use HAProxy as part of an IOT device server. As my devices will be bandwidth and resource contained, I can't use HTTP protocol but require content aware routing and stickiness similar to what HAProxy offers in HTTP mode today, over a custom protocol on top of TCP. What,