Re: Peer tables don't synch on clear

On 02/12/2018 04:28 PM, Franks Andy (IT Technical Architecture Manager) wrote: Hi Fred, Hi Franks, Please bottom post when you reply. Thanks for the reply. I have two peers synchronising (we use keepalived over the two to control which is live). HAProxy config: peers lb_replication

Re: Plans for 1.9

DNS over TCP :)

Re: Server-template and randomized DNS responses

To share the solution with everyone, the problem was fixed by a configuration update. Mike added a "accepted_payload_size 1024" into his resolvers section. HAProxy announces by an accepted payload of 512 bytes, which let the place for only 3 records reported by consul. With a payload of 1024, up

Fwd: Plans for 1.9

-- Forwarded message -- From: David CARLIER Date: 12 February 2018 at 15:37 Subject: Plans for 1.9 To: w...@1wt.eu Was thinking as a contrib work, making haproxy more fuzzer "compliant" (AFL and LLVM/fuzzer for example) which would mean turning haproxy into a

RE: Peer tables don't synch on clear

Hi Fred, Thanks for the reply. I have two peers synchronising (we use keepalived over the two to control which is live). HAProxy config: peers lb_replication peer server1 10.128.176.141:1024 peer server2 10.128.176.142:1024 backend sourceaddr stick-table type ip size 10240k

Fwd: haproxy-1.8 build failure on FreeBSD/i386 (clang)

-- Forwarded message -- From: David CARLIER Date: 12 February 2018 at 14:37 Subject: Re: haproxy-1.8 build failure on FreeBSD/i386 (clang) To: trtrmi...@gmail.com I think I m the one behing this relatively recent change ... why not adding in the condition the

[PATCH]; BUILD/(VERY) MINOR

Hi I had this patch locally for couple of weeks just having the proper current year reliably for the verbosity information part, relying on the startup date. Kind regards. From deab708b01f90a14e466dcca29056b007eddd600 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Carlier Date: Fri,

[Patch] Error in Lua documentation

Hi, This is a small patch about the Lua documentation. it should be backported in 1.8 Note that the function prototype is compatible with old versions. Thierry >From 4feaa411b6cca0b3a57ebe16c13ce056d93eb74a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thierry FOURNIER Date: Mon,

Re: Peer tables don't synch on clear

On 02/08/2018 11:22 AM, Franks Andy (IT Technical Architecture Manager) wrote: Hi all, Hello Franks,   Haproxy 1.6.13   I’ve checked the documentation again but can’t see an option for this. We sometimes clear backup path server use for individual connections and whilst the peers

Re: Server-template and randomized DNS responses

Replying to myself :) I think I spotted a bug in HAProxy as well. For some reasons, when I run HAProxy in debug more, I never ever have the issue (all my servers are properly populated and maintained). I did a strace of the process running in daemon mode in the container, and I can confirm the

Re: Server-template and randomized DNS responses

Continuing on my investigation I found an other interesting piece of information: I run haproxy and my consul environment in a docker host, through docker-compose and I can reproduce the same issue as you. Basically, I have a service delivered by 20 containers, and HAProxy in docker can see only

Re: Server-template and randomized DNS responses

First, I confirm the following bug in consul 1.0.5: - start a X instances of a service - scale the service to X+Y (with Y > 1) ==> then consul crashes... >From time to time, I also saw HAProxy getting only 10 servers from 20 for a given service. I'll revert to 1.0.2 for now. The order of the