Hi Pieter,
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 12:00:14AM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
> The parameters like server-address, port and timeout should be set before
> process_stream task is called to avoid the stream being 'closed' before it
> got initialized properly. This is most clearly visible when running with
>
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:32:24PM +0200, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> This can't be applied to 1.8, as it uses code that was not, and probably won't
> be, backported, so a different patch, similar in spirit, will be developed.
Thanks for these patches. Now applied. I mentioned the point
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:23:37PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Am 30.04.2018 um 18:24 schrieb stable-...@haproxy.com:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next
> > haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent every week once patches
> > are
Hi List, Thierry, Willy,
Created another little patch. Hope this one fits all submission criteria.
Regards,
PiBa-NL (Pieter)
From cc4adb62c55f268e9e74853f4a4893e2a3734aec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PiBa-NL
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 23:51:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: lua: schedule socket
On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> > Also I'm thinking that we can even use 32-bit by putting the frontier
> > between the date and the fixed priority (let's call it class) somewhere
> > else :
> > - 8 bit class + 24 bit offset => 256 classes and +/- 2.3 hours offs
On 2018/5/5 01:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:49:00PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> I'm not quite following the need for multiple queues. Why wouldn't you
>> just have one sorted queue, where if multiple pending requests have the
>> same priority, then they're FIFO.
> Tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
