Re: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: dns: Correctly use weight specified in SRV record

2019-10-16 Thread Baptiste
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:35 AM Daniel Corbett wrote: > Hello, > > > In #48 it was reported that when using the server-template > > directive combined with an SRV record that HAProxy would > always set the weight to "1" regardless of what the SRV record > contains. > > It was found that in an

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: dns: Correctly use weight specified in SRV record

2019-10-16 Thread Daniel Corbett
Hello, On 10/16/19 11:32 PM, Daniel Corbett wrote: This patch should be backported to 1.8 and 1.9 Sorry, I forgot to indicate that this should be backported to 2.0 also. Thanks, -- Daniel

[PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: dns: Correctly use weight specified in SRV record

2019-10-16 Thread Daniel Corbett
Hello, In #48 it was reported that when using the server-template directive combined with an SRV record that HAProxy would always set the weight to "1" regardless of what the SRV record contains. It was found that in an attempt to force a minimum value of "1" actually ended up forcing "1" in

Re: HAproxy transparent proxy and IPv6

2019-10-16 Thread Philipp Kolmann
Hi, I did some more testing and found the reason why it didn't work: I have added the required ip cmds:     post-up ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100     post-up ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100     post-up ip route add local ::/0 dev lo table 100 ip rule add fwmark

[PATCH] BUG/MINOR: sample: Make the `field` converter compatible with `-m found`

2019-10-16 Thread Tim Duesterhus
Previously an expression like: path,field(2,/) -m found always returned `true`. Bug exists since the `field` converter exists. That is: f399b0debfc6c7dc17c6ad503885c911493add56 The fix should be backported to 1.6+. --- reg-tests/converter/field.vtc | 39 +++

Re: Issue with HTX

2019-10-16 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 16/10/2019 à 08:48, GARDAIS Ionel a écrit : Hi Christopher, First : good news : I was not able to reproduce the issue with 2.1-dev2-e0f48a-88 and HTX enable. I guess e0f8dc576f62ace9ad1055ca068ab5d4f3a952aa was the culprit. To answer your questions and for others on the list : - The issue

Re: Issue with HTX

2019-10-16 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Hi Christopher, First : good news : I was not able to reproduce the issue with 2.1-dev2-e0f48a-88 and HTX enable. I guess e0f8dc576f62ace9ad1055ca068ab5d4f3a952aa was the culprit. To answer your questions and for others on the list : - The issue arose with H1 (H2 not enable) - It's the client