stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.2 (25), 2.1 (18), 2.0 (15), 1.8 (20)

2020-10-27 Thread stable-bot
Hi, This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Cache fixes

2020-10-27 Thread William Lallemand
Hello Tim, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:15:04PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote: > William, > Rémi, > > I'm super happy to see that the support for if-none-match made it into 2.3. I > already was considering poking under some of the recent -devX announcements, > but thought it already was too late for

Bid Writing, Major Donors and Volunteering workshops via Zoom

2020-10-27 Thread NFP Workshops
NFP WORKSHOPS 18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG 01133 280988 Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector Organisations This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail2001.co.uk

Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread Илья Шипицин
Good good good On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 5:10 PM William Lallemand wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:51:57PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > Hi, > > > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > > than version based check. > > > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1

Re: [PATCH] update h2spec to 2.6.0

2020-10-27 Thread William Lallemand
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 07:37:16PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > Hi, > > we missed couple of releases. > > Ilya Merged, thanks. -- William Lallemand

Re: stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.2 (20), 2.1 (16), 2.0 (15), 1.8 (20)

2020-10-27 Thread Peter Statham
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 16:18, wrote: > > Hi, > > Last release 1.8.26 was issued on 2020-08-03. There are currently 20 > patches in the queue cut down this way: > - 10 MEDIUM, first one merged on 2020-08-05 > - 10 MINOR, first one merged on 2020-08-03 > > Thus the computed ideal

Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread William Lallemand
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:51:57PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > Hi, > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > than version based check. > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1 compatibility version. > > > > cheers, > Ilya Totally agree with this, merged in

Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread Илья Шипицин
ping :) сб, 24 окт. 2020 г. в 23:51, Илья Шипицин : > Hi, > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > than version based check. > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1 compatibility version. > > > > cheers, > Ilya >

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: ssl: OCSP must work with BoringSSL

2020-10-27 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 02:32:20PM +0100, ehoc...@club-internet.fr wrote: > ‌‌Hi, > > It's a fix for a regression with OCSP and BoringSSL. > OCSP work with BorginSSL, not at the same way than openssl, but it work: > OCSP data is simply link to CTX context. > > ++ > Manu > > > Thanks, pushed