CentOS 6 isn't EOL until the end of the month, so there is a couple of more
weeks left.
There is at least one place to pay for support through 2024.
($3/month/server)
Might be good to keep for a a bit past EOL, as I know when migrating
services sometimes I'll throw a proxy server on the old
One of those jobs uses ERR=
I keep an eye on them:) will remove them sometimes
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020, 11:16 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 11.11.20 um 19:18 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some travis-ci cleanup.
> >
> > Ilya
> >
>
> I believe these can be removed as well, can't
Ilya,
Am 11.11.20 um 19:18 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> Hi,
>
> some travis-ci cleanup.
>
> Ilya
>
I believe these can be removed as well, can't they?
- os: linux
if: type == push
compiler: clang
env: TARGET=linux-glibc LIBRESSL_VERSION=3.1.1 CC=clang-9
name: libressl-3.1.1
-
Hello,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 17:14, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we still run cirrus-ci builds.
> CentOS 6 is EOL.
>
> should we drop it?
I think CentOs6 gives us good feedback about older operating systems
that we may not necessarily want to break.
The question for me is not so much
Ilya,
Am 15.11.20 um 17:14 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> we still run cirrus-ci builds.
> CentOS 6 is EOL.
>
> should we drop it?
>
If it's EOL and they did not upgrade the OS then they are either lazy or
interesting in "stability". Either way they are probably not going to
upgrade HAProxy any
Hello,
we still run cirrus-ci builds.
CentOS 6 is EOL.
should we drop it?
Ilya
while looking at `url_dec` implementation I realised there was not yet a
simple test to avoid future regressions.
This one is testing simple case, including the "+" behaviour depending
on the argument passed to `url_dec`
Signed-off-by: William Dauchy
---
reg-tests/converter/url_dec.vtc | 38
Hi Tim,
thanks for the review.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:50 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Am 15.11.20 um 13:45 schrieb William Dauchy:
> > +#REQUIRE_OPTION=OPENSSL
>
> I don't believe OPENSSL is required. The test passes for me even without
> compiling with SSL.
true bad copy/paste on my side.
>
William,
Am 15.11.20 um 13:45 schrieb William Dauchy:
> +#REQUIRE_OPTION=OPENSSL
I don't believe OPENSSL is required. The test passes for me even without
compiling with SSL.
> +client c1 -connect ${h1_fe_sock} {
> + txreq -url "/bla+?foo%3Dbar%2B42+42"
Maybe add %20 to the string to test
while looking at `url_dec` implementation I realised there was not yet a
simple test to avoid future regressions.
This one is testing simple case, including the "+" behaviour depending
on the argument passed to `url_dec`
Signed-off-by: William Dauchy
---
reg-tests/converter/url_dec.vtc | 39
10 matches
Mail list logo