Re: Proposal: modify stat socket command feedback

On 07/03/2017 01:46 PM, Andjelko Iharos wrote: > On 07/02/2017 09:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:37:52AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> This could either be introduced only in the current development version >>> because of

Proposal: modify stat socket command feedback

\n" Should there be no objections to the proposal I will submit a patch for review. Best regards, Andjelko -- Andjelko Iharos Senior Architect, HAProxy Technologies, Inc. haproxy.com The World's #1 Deployed Load Balancer

Re: Proposal: modify stat socket command feedback

On 07/02/2017 09:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:37:52AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> I had to deal with this issue recently as well but I'd rather like to >> see a more explicit and well defined response in all cases rather than >> the workaround

Re: Experimental / broken HTTP/2 support

Thanks for the high praises! Let's also call out Dragan Dosen (he actually integrated mod_defender) and Christopher Faulet for the excellent groundwork on establishing SPOE as a basis for new additions. There will be more good things coming and we hope to continue to support such success stories

Re: Proposal: modify stat socket command feedback

Bumping up this thread for comments or merging. On 07/21/2017 04:49 PM, Andjelko Iharos wrote: > On 07/03/2017 01:46 PM, Andjelko Iharos wrote: >> On 07/02/2017 09:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:37:52AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > &