.
Don't see anything interesting in the logs..
Any ideas anyone?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
.
Don't see anything interesting in the logs..
Any ideas anyone?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
of the port.
Any idea when the 'net/haproxy' port wil be upgraded to 1.3.x?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Fri05PM 0:01.72
/usr/sbin/syslogd -a 127.0.0.1:*
in my haproxy.conf is:
global
log 127.0.0.1 local0 notice
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA
?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
+31 (0)13 5821239
a.hong
the sessions in a central db, and identifying
users by cookies or something like that, like all big players do).
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
control over the backend application)
Just my 2 cents.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535
net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst=49152
net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast=65535
@Willy or someone else, feel free to comment on these settings if you
see something strange.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS
with that, as long as the errors are clear ;)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA
. I'm running FreeBSD
7.2-RELEASE amd64 with a custom kernel (carp compiled in). Installed
1.3.22 from haproxy-devel, that works fine..
No time to dig deeper now, but if you need any help let me know, perhaps
I can do some tests this week if needed.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems
regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
+31 (0)13 5821239
a.hong...@netmatch.nl
people
wrote http balancers :)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13
On 23-4-2010 11:19, Michiel van Es wrote:
Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same priority
have little to do with eachother. Still, you say
http-server-close is about twice as fast as httpclose. Am I not
interpreting things right?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
, and the
'public' interface only has port 80 open. SSH and other services only
listen on the inside interface. In this case you don't really need a
firewall to close ports.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business
run a combination of haproxy,
varnish, squid, apache, whatever fits my requirements.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software
in my opinion it's best at
balancing. We use squid for balancing and ssl offloading, and varnish
for high-volume caching.
see diagram for inspiration:
http://files.hongens.nl/2010/05/21/2010_balancers_diagram.pdf
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
On 6-7-2010 20:28, Angelo Höngens wrote:
We use haproxy for balancing, because in my opinion it's best at
balancing. We use squid for balancing and ssl offloading, and varnish
for high-volume caching.
reply-to-self: I meant squid/varnish for *caching*
--
With kind regards,
Angelo
it as well.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
--
We use it for www.zoover.nl, www.weeronline.nl, www.snp.nl, etc. (in
combination with either squid or varnish caches though).
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan
.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
the right init script for my distro, etc.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong
On 24-10-2010 21:44, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:05:38PM +, Angelo Höngens wrote:
Hey, does anyone know a place I can find rhel5 rpm's for the latest
1.4 releases? The popular repositories all seem to have only 1.3..
I'm not aware of any, and since the original
I'm wondering what the difference would be between the standard slow e1000
virtual network card and the fast paravirtualized vmxnet3 virtual network card.
In theory, the latter one should be much, much faster..
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
Great, I'd really like to see 1.4.9 in the rhel5 epel repo :)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
://blog.hongens.nl/guides/setting-up-a-pacemaker-cluster-on-centosrhel/
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13
there (and keeping
ipv4 around makes things more complex).
(for the interested, here are some more of my thoughts on ipv6 and where we are
now: http://ipv6.netmatch.nl)
I don't need a reaction, just think about it ;)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
Or you could remove the client's xff header, and always use your own. Then you
are sure you can trust your own xff header, and the client can't bypass.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software
Read Willy's response from earlier today, he showed the command.. (I use
another product in front of haproxy that removes the header in my case).
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software
load.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
, but in the end we almost always get a perfect
25-25-25-25 balancing.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13
see a request graph of one of my clusters:
http://files.hongens.nl/2011/01/06/varnishrequests.png
As you see the distribution is not perfect, but for me it's enough.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business
Hey guys,
I'm building a solution where I am ssl-offloading some old plain http
applications.
The http ports are listening on 8001, 8002, 8003, etc. I'm using haproxy
1.8.12 to listen on ports 18001, 18002, 18003, etc. using ssl. Everything
works fine, as expected.
I am trying to make stuff a
33 matches
Mail list logo