On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:14:32PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi Willy,
Le Mardi 5 Janvier 2010 06:15:54, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
The only suspected remaining issue reported by Cyril seems not to be one
at first after some tests. I could reproduce the same behaviour but the
close_wait
Hi Krzysztof,
I've merged all of your patches. However I have a minor concern
about something in this one :
-The currently supported settings are the following ones.
+The currently supported settings are the following ones, the ones marked with
+[D] are also upported for default-server.
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:58:17PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Le Mardi 5 Janvier 2010 23:42:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:14:32PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Well, eventually after several different tests, that's OK for me.
A short http-request timeout
Hi Hank,
as I suspected, the problem was with the header capture. They were not
released before being erased when clearing the session for a new keep-alive
request. I have fixed it in git if you want to try the snapshot again :
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:51:46AM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
I'm working on a web UI for administering the haproxy config and I have a
question I can't find the answer to in the documentation. Are the listener
blocks unique with respect to IP:port? That is, is this valid:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:20:24PM -0500, Hector Danniel Paz Trillo wrote:
Hi,
I have this configuration haproxy - nginx (static) - apache (php) .
It is working fine for large traffic sites. These days I'm adding a
new site and I starting to see 502 errors when saving a form with POST
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 08:40:59PM -0500, Hector Danniel Paz Trillo wrote:
Thanks Willy!
I recompile haproxy with:
-DBUFSIZE=16000 -DMAXREWRITE=1024 -DSYSTEM_MAXCONN=4
It doesn't work. Then I recompile with:
-DBUFSIZE=64000 -DMAXREWRITE=1024 -DSYSTEM_MAXCONN=4
And it works.
Hi all,
well, some of you have encountered issues with 1.4-dev5
with sessions left in CLOSE_WAIT state or with memory leaks.
With the help of Cyril Bonté and Hank A. Paulson who have sent
a lot of feedback and tested almost all intermediate versions,
we finally managed to nail all the problems
Hi Bart,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:00:42PM +0100, Bart van der Schans wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I really like haproxy and I'm really exited about the
keep-alive support! So I gave the new 1.4-dev6 spin, but I'm getting a
segfault.
When I run haproxy (with -d) in gdb I get:
Program
Hi James,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:09:43PM +, James Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
I have apache servers with mod_proxy sitting in front of jboss servers, with
this new code I frequently get only half the page I requested loaded in my
browser. It doesn?t happen if I go to the jbosses directly.
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:13:37PM -0800, Bryan Talbot wrote:
I'm trying to understand exactly what this termination state means. I'm
seeing http connections from clients that seem to be complete and queued.
These requests seem to be timing out from the queue well before the timeout
Hi again Bart,
I confirm that I forgot to reinit the session cookie in keep-alive.
Could you please apply the attached patch to your sources and try
again ?
I tried to reproduce the issue but failed to do so, reason why I'm
asking for a test.
Thanks
Willy
diff --git a/src/proto_http.c
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 06:24:46PM +, Hector Danniel Paz Trillo wrote:
Thanks for all the suggestions, i'm going to try them. Do you think
that this value of BUFSIZE may cause some security or perfomance
issues in haproxy?
no, in fact it may even improve performance to have larger buffers.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:03:16AM -0800, Hank A. Paulson wrote:
I wanted to report after using 1.4-dev6 for several sites for a couple days
that the results seem very good.
One site was peaking at over 150 Mbps and over 65 million hits past couple
of days, during that time memory use
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0800, Craig Carl wrote:
All -
I installed from source so I could set USE_PCRE=1. It doesn't look
like the make process included a startup script for /etc/init.d/. The
two included files (init.haproxy, haproxy.init) both look to be for RedHat.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Holger Just wrote:
Hi Craig,
(sorry, for double posting, missed the correct button...)
On 10.01.10 11:01, Craig Carl wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find a /etc/init.d/haproxy script for
Debian?
The simplest approach would probably be
Hi Bart,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Bart van der Schans wrote:
Hi Willy,
Thanks for the quick response and the patch. I've applied the patch
and it seems to be running fine now and I can't reproduce the
segfault.
thanks. It has been merged into mainline.
Regards,
Willy
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:01:47PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi again Willy,
Le Dimanche 10 Janvier 2010 00:47:14, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Good catch ! Aleks and I have spent some time in the past to track
memory leaks in this area. This is a sensible area because it's one
where we're
Hi John,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 02:50:24PM -0500, John Norman wrote:
Hi.
What happens if the same cookie is named in two (or more) backends? Is
the table in which the cookie value is placed shared among backends,
or is there a separate table per backend?
There's a separate table per
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
From 12aaba5a79caafb7ebcee3f52a4685a387306e8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki o...@ans.pl
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:12:58 +0100
Subject: [BUG] health checks: fix requeued message
Dummy copypast
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:56:38AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Imagine the following scenario: we have large number of requests from
different clients. Each client send request rarely, so no need for keep-alive
between client and haproxy.
OK I see your usage pattern now. I know three
Hi Ross,
first, thanks for bringing your experience here, it's much appreciated.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:27:09AM -0500, Ross West wrote:
I'll enter in this conversation as I've used (successfully) a load
balancer which did server-side keep-alive a while ago.
WT Hmmm that's different.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:01:52PM -0500, Ross West wrote:
WT It's not only a matter of caching the request to replay it, it is that
WT you're simply not allowed to. I know a guy who ordered a book at a
WT large well-known site. His order was processed twice. Maybe there is
WT something on
Hi Ross,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:12:04PM -0500, Ross West wrote:
I can see a small confusion here because I've used the wrong
terminology. Proxy is not the correct term, as there are actual proxy
devices out there (eg: Squid) which are generally visible to the
client/server and shouldn't
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:47:00PM -0800, Craig Carl wrote:
That cleared up the error, thanks Ryan.
FYI I took that config straight out of the documentation -
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/architecture.txt
thanks for pointing it and sorry for this. I remember having
fixed them in
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:12:45PM -0800, Jose Avila(Tachu) wrote:
I have a theory on a recent issue i've been experiencing for the last 2 days
that i would like some clarification on.
I have a load balancer with 30 backend servers with a roundrobin balance line
and a maxconn
per
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:33:58PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
I stumbled across a few SC results in my logs, which the docs say is:
SC The server or an equipement between it and haproxy explicitly refused
the TCP connection (the proxy received a TCP RST or an ICMP message
Hi Cyril,
thanks for your tests. I'll leave it up to you and Hervé to improve
on existing code, since I really have no added value here (I don't
even have one mysql at hand).
Concerning possible choices, I agree that we must do our best not
to perturbate the service. Most of the time when people
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:20:29AM +, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there a limit on the amount of infomation you can put as part of an
acl? I want to do the following:
acl ip_ssl_block_72 hdr_reg(X-Real-IP) 10.10.10.10
use hdr_ip() and not hdr_reg. It returns
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:52:45AM +, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Sorry to reply to my own email - but as an extension of this would it be
feasible to have a hdr_src option for use in in the same manner as using
the src option that supports matching if an IP is in a range (only with
hdr_src
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:21:13PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
A simple question - is the data received from the back-end server
stored on haproxy until all the data is received, before that date
is then sent on to the client? I didn't think so, but I wasn't sure
now.
no it's not.
Hi Hervé,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:34:38PM +0100, Herve COMMOWICK wrote:
Hi Cyril,
You forgot the log-error option that much sysadmin use for correct debugging
without pollution, but i don't think it logs incorrect logging (if i
remember well).
The Authentication packet is mandatory
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:36:06PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
(...)
Hervé's patch is near the lightest check haproxy can do, the
haproxy user can be provided in the authentication request
(or not) and I'd prefer the response to be ignored as it can
have side effect on the backend server
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:08:18PM +0100, Alexander Staubo wrote:
This is only tangentially related to HAProxy, but our sysadmins are
coming up short, so I'm hoping someone on this list will be able to
help.
We are experiencing a lot of missing log entries when running
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:51:23PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
(...)
Sample entry from my logs:
Jan 20 14:33:49 lbtest1 haproxy[25582]: :34456
[20/Jan/2010:14:33:47.826] LDAPFarm LDAPFarm/dp2 0/0/1227 202 --
29/29/29/13/0 0/0
(...)
Is actconn across all pools (eg: all listen
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 05:01:24PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote:
Hi,
I use nginx + haproxy , in one box , to load balance 4 web server.
The load is about 5000 request/second for haproxy.
Sometimes there is tcp port is not available error.
This is not normal. This probably means that your
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:05:16PM +0800, ËïéªËÉ wrote:
Hello ! I have questions ! please help me ! thank you very much !
my cluster works , but not excellent. that's
please see this architecture below my questions first.
Q1:on the tomcats ,there are always 500~800 TIME_WAIT connections
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:59:05PM +0100, Andrew Azarov wrote:
Is there any possibility to add freebsd accept filter? recently a sin
flood made our haproxy die of high amount of ram being used...
If it was a SYN flood, it would not change anything, because haproxy
does not get notified until
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:37:12PM +0100, Alexander Staubo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
it may happen depending on the load, your syslog daemon and its config.
The syslog daemon from the sysklogd package is generally OK up to 1000
logs per second
Hi,
haproxy 1.4-dev7 is now available. As always, I would have liked
to issue it earlier but when working on the end-to-end keepalive,
I discovered several issues in the client-side keep-alive code
that needed to be fixed, the last one dating one hour ago. So
finally no end-to-end keep-alive in
Hi Cyril,
this was a nice cleanup, I've merged it.
Thanks!
Willy
Hi all,
Krzysztof Oledzki managed to make dev7 reliably crash. After
investigation, it appeared that one of the latest keep-alive
bugs I had fixed was not complete as the same code was present
in another function.
In practice, 1.4-dev5, -dev6 and -dev7 are affected by the same
bug and may
Hello Fabien,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:12:25AM +0100, Fabien Germain wrote:
Hello,
I have a web hosting cluster, and I would like to rate limit by vhost
(i.e. no more than 50 connections per second on www.domain1.com, for
example). I found a way to do so, and I'd like to get your feeling
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:38:29AM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
My stats page (thank you, got that working) shows I have 20 conn
errors. The three backend servers all show 0 in all the boxes, but
the backend row shows blank 20 and 0 in the three Error
columns (Req, Conn, Resp.)
I looked
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi Willy,
Le Lundi 25 Janvier 2010 02:29:24, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
(...)
- the stickiness code was merged.
Sorry today I don't have time to work on a patch, but I hope the feedback
will help you.
I've made
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 01:51:30PM -0500, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hello,
I suspect that in fact you're diverting the 503 to use an errorfile
directive to return some specific data. This won't be needed anymore
once we
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:15:30PM +0100, Franco Imboden wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning a failover scenario of a webservice where no
cookies are supported.
as long as nothing happens, all requests should be routed to side A. If side
A is not reachable anymore,
Hi !
after 3.5 months of minor updates and bugfixes, here comes haproxy 1.3.23.
It fixes a few minor to medium issues :
- several annoying config parser issues causing incorrect or imprecise
error detection/reporting, as well as one bug when dealing with long lines.
- a weakness in the
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:34:30AM -0800, Craig Carl wrote:
I totally missed the *.23. Sorry about my confusion.
well, I have still not built it (as I didn't build the .22 either),
but I updated the links just in case. I'll have to replug my sun
hoping it still works.
Willy
Hi David,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:58:09PM -0800, David Birdsong wrote:
I'm curious what others are doing to achieve high connection rates
-say 10Kconnections/ second.
We're serving objects averaging around 100KB, so 10K/sec is a fully
utilized 1G ethernet card.
No, at 10k/sec you're at
Hi Cyril,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 07:54:55PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi willy,
this is a first attempt to add a maintenance mode on servers, using the stat
socket (in admin level).
It can be done with the following command :
set maintenance backend/server on (or off to leave the
Hi David,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:41:20AM -0800, David Birdsong wrote:
we serve media. i double checked the average size simply by reading
content length values and averaging them for every 100 and 1000
requests over a 5 minute period.
yep, 85-95kB is what we serve mostlyall images.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:34:03PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
OK, I didn't see it like this. I thought it was better to have the same
behaviour as if those servers were not checked at all, and that users have
the possibility to disable the tracking servers by hand.
In fact not because the
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 01:42:53AM +0100, XANi wrote:
Hi
it's statically in the kernel, i haven't gottten around to recompiling
the kernel yet to compile it out.
i am using the NOTRACK module to bypass all traffic around conntrack
though.
What a shame :-(
Unless I'm
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi, am getting these results in haproxy logs:
Feb 2 13:17:40 localhost haproxy[3245]:
10.10.10.62:54164[02/Feb/2010:13:17:40.774] load_balanced
load_balanced/www1 -1/1/1/-1/4 0
715 - - 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 BADREQ
I
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:00:47PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi again,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 21:07:04, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
OK, you'll find a small update (smaller than I firstly thought) in
attachment.
please forget the previous one and find this new one that correctly
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Holger Just wrote:
Hi
On 2010-02-02 16:19, Anthony D wrote:
I understand that HAproxy can do L7 header manipulation, however I read
in the manual that it doesn't touch the data contents. Are there any
plans for adding this option?
I can not
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:26:24PM +, Alex Forrow wrote:
Just to provide an update to this issue, the problem was caused by
mis-configured conntrack. Temporary removal of this module solved the issue.
thanks for the update Alex, that's much appreciated !
Willy
Hi,
OK now things have stabilized a lot, not yet in terms of code, but
at least in terms of usability. There were no bug affecting the
state machine nor data integrity since last release, which hopefully
means that we're now safe again.
This one is called 1.4-rc1, which indicates that we should
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:52:36PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi Willy,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
at first I was hesitating because those DOWN/MAINT can become quite
confusing, but after some thinking, the current situation is already
confusing.
So I
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:52:36, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
(...)
In my opinion the real state is MAINT, and we may complete it with
some info indicating
Hi Peter,
it's needless to resend your mail 3 times. Most people on this list aren't
always available, but are generally helpful. Sometimes you just have to be
a bit patient.
I see no timeout in your stunnel configuration :
My stunnel.conf:
#setuid=stunnel
#setgid=proxy
debug = 3
output
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:43:05PM -0800, Craig Carl wrote:
I've been beating my head against this for a week, I'm stuck. I am
trying to do a really, really simple acl.
listen webservers 9.4.184.166:80
acl yahoo url_dom -i yahoo
redirect prefix https://yahoo.com if yahoo
Won't
Hello Serge,
this list is english-speaking, but please see my responses below.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Reynier Serge wrote:
Bonjour,
j'ai mis un haproxy en place pour des connexions MySQL et j'aimerai
loguer seulement les erreurs et warning de haproxy visible sur la page
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:51:45AM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Will,
I didn't see my post in the archives and since this is a production site I
panicked.
Thank you so much for your explanation, it's much clearer now. I will make
the changes and report back how it went. Do you think
Hi Gabriel,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:39:06PM -0200, Gabriel Sosa wrote:
guys,
we have customized the 503 and added google analytcs on it to know
how many errors we get. So far we are seeing few errors and I would
like to know if this is because backed servers are full or what.
Also I
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:26PM +, william pink wrote:
Hi,
I have three Xen instances with public IP addresses and I want to install
Haproxy and balance between the two backends, I have done alots of searching
but I can't seem to pin point the issue. Here is the issue when I start it
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:31:03PM +0100, Holger Just wrote:
On 2010-02-04 21:15, Sriram Chavali wrote:
I am trying to rewrite URLs using haproxy's reqirep directive. The url that
I am trying to rewrite is of the pattern
/action/register?param1=fooparam2=barparam3=baz
The URL
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
The minute I put the changes and made the loadbalancer active, external
users experienced serious downtime. I tried accessing our site from an
external source and sure enough we were unbrowsable. So I had to take
haproxy off
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:16:00PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
Both http https. Also both web servers started to take it in turns to
report as DOWN but more frequently the second one than the first.
I ran ethtool eth0 and can verify that it's full-duplex 1Gbps:
OK.
I'm attaching dmesg, I
Hello Gustavo,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:56:45AM -0500, gustavo.jimenez wrote:
Hello
i have installed haproxy in a machine t2000 solaris10-sparc, it's work in
tcp mode and as a load balancer of a transactional switchs, it's has a good
performance but my problem is that i can see a log
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
The error earlier reported during -dev7 about not compiling with
DEBUG_FULL is still present in rc1 and ss-20100208. As that msg
indicated, changing it f rom req to rep allowed the compile.
grrr, it seems I lost the patch. Care to
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 07:37:03PM +0100, Berco Beute wrote:
I want to use HAPROXY between a slow mysql clients and a mysql server to
minimize database interaction time. The large network latency between the
client and database is currently a performance bottleneck. The database is
often
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:09:31PM -0700, Neal Richter wrote:
Hi all,
We've been happily using haproxy as a load balancer between a pool
of apache boxes and a pool or tomcat boxes for 3 years in AWS.
Amazing piece of software that gives us zero issues.
Question. Has anyone
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:07:14PM -0700, Neal Richter wrote:
I realize its a non-load balacer use and agree with the inherent issue
you point-out. Yet there are few pieces of software as capable at
handling concurrent connections to disparate destinations with low
overhead as haproxy.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:11:27AM -0600, Nicholas Hadaway wrote:
Hello,
(7:40:39 AM) raker: so... last weekend I upgraded to HAProxy 1.4_rc1...
(7:40:56 AM) raker: and I enabled logging...
(7:41:52 AM) raker: and I managed to write a LogFormat in analog that
parses it!
(7:42:07 AM)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:56:14PM +, Nick Chalk wrote:
Thanks Willy, Krzysztof.
2010/2/10 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Did you managed to fix the several remaining issues which could cause
it to crash the process ?
I believe so, following Cyril Bonté's suggestions last week. I'm
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:06:19PM -0600, Nicholas Hadaway wrote:
Thanks Willy!
I think in this format I will be able to get less corrupted lines when
parsing... but it didn't simplify things really...
Because of the syslog framing and extra timing fields, I still need to
write a custom
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Ol??dzki wrote:
There are several issues with the fix:
- we need to check if connection is not closed, as it is pointless to
use MSG_PEEK and restarting such check if there is no more data we are
able to read
Indeed, with MSG_PEEK we
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:08:24PM -0800, AJ Asver wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using HAProxy combined with beanstalkd to create redundant queueing
system. Everything is working except that I've noticed that I can queue far
more messages when I push them directly to beanstalkd rather than
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:53:16AM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
We're contemplating a design where we'll have two servers, A and B. On
each, we'll have 8 instances of our application running, on ports
8081-8088. This is mainly to effectively use multiple cores.
The
Hi Nick,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:05:57AM +, Nick Chalk wrote:
Hello Willy, Krzysztof.
On 13 February 2010 10:40, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Ol??dzki wrote:
There are several issues with the fix:
- we need to check
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:54:35PM +0100, XANi wrote:
Dnia 2010-02-25, czw o godzinie 16:27 -0500, Greg Gard pisze:
hi willy and friends,
i am working on a set of ruby scripts to do database failover and
stonith. so far all is working pretty well, but i have a few issues:
1)
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:38:55AM -0500, Jeff Buchbinder wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
I'm obviously interested in any problem report :-)
Build on OpenBSD 4.3 seems to fail unless #include common/compat.h
is commented out of the src/lb_*.c files. This seemed to be the case
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:45:58AM -0500, Jeff Buchbinder wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
I'm obviously interested in any problem report :-)
One other OpenBSD build problem that I saw was that OBJS in Makefile.bsd
seems to be missing:
src/auth.o src/stick_table.o src/pattern.o
oops
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:57:16PM -0500, Jeff Buchbinder wrote:
With that patch it does seem to build the files that were getting stuck
before under OpenBSD 4.3.
Excellent, thanks very much Jeff for your quick response,
I'm applying the patch now.
Cheers,
Willy
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 03:15:25PM +1030, Andrew Commons wrote:
Hi all,
The ability to extend the option httpchk version argument string to dummy
up a Host header is described as a 'trick' in the configuration
documentation. I have found that the 'trick' can be extended to add
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:07:40PM -0800, Joe Williams wrote:
I wasn't able to find it in the documentation, what does the sL
termination flag stand for?
strange. It means there was a server timeout during the last
transfer from the server to the client. But normally the last
transfer is
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 07:59:27PM +1030, Andrew Commons wrote:
Hi Willy,
Thanks for the comprehensive response. My HAProxy experience is measured in
days and the mailing list seems a great way to get support and your
contributions are always spot on. HAProxy looks like a
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:17:12AM -0800, Joe Williams wrote:
Looks like all the most recent sL's I have seen have been GET requests.
OK thanks Joe.
I will look into the code to see how we can produce that. Maybe
it's normal, but no obvious case comes to my mind.
Regards,
Willy
Hi Holger,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Holger Just wrote:
Hi all,
On 2010-02-26 16:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I'm obviously interested in any problem report :-)
I'm trying to compile Haproxy 1.4 on Opensolaris Build 133 (i386 on a
Core i7). This however fails.
thanks
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:25:06PM +, Nick Chalk wrote:
Hello Willy.
On 25 February 2010 20:25, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:05:57AM +, Nick Chalk wrote:
On 13 February 2010 10:40, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Indeed, with MSG_PEEK we
Hi Jean-Christophe Stéphane,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:28:57PM +0100, Jean-Christophe TOUSSAINT wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
For our own needs, a Nagios plugin has been developed to check haproxy
activity (and hosts status).
The plugin checks HAProxy
Hi Holger,
I could get the same errors on my ultra5 under solaris 8
which correctly builds 1.3. I finally tracked that down to
the #define XOPEN_SOURCE 500 in auth.c. If I remove it,
everything builds as before.
Krzysztof, you told me you had to add it otherwise you got a
warning on your
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:29:01AM +0100, Krzysztof Ol??dzki wrote:
First, sorry for the problem I have made. :(
hey please don't be sorry, here we say that we don't make
omelettes without breaking eggs :-)
Accoriding to crypt(3) from man-pages-3.21 it is required to define
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Finally, encryption was only tested on Linux and FreeBSD so it could be
nice to verify if it works on Solaris in the same way (with -lcrypt) and
to add USE_LIBCRYPT for ifeq ($(TARGET),solaris).
OK I'm testing it now
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:02:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Ol??dzki wrote:
On 2010-03-03 00:47, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Finally, encryption was only tested on Linux and FreeBSD so it could be
nice to verify if it works on Solaris in the same
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:30:50PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
Hi All, anyone have any ideas if this is something in version bug (do not
want to upgrade if not) or is something I can control with configuration.
So what I see running haproxy is when there are bursts (an additional lets
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Falco Schmutz wrote:
Hi,
I know this thread thanks you :-)
I just want to know if there is a way to do this whiteout iptables.
Not right now, we would need to develop an FTP protocol parser
and the ability to expect incoming connections (basically just
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:34:46PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
the problem got serious so I stood up another LB set of instances and
installed v1.3.23 all traffic is getting routed over to it.
what I used to see in the logs where just NOSRV 503 in the haproxy log once
it hit max con.
OK but
301 - 400 of 8211 matches
Mail list logo
