Re: ACL block ignored in 2.0.25

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:59 AM Olivier Houchard wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Bart van der Schans wrote: > > Here is the patch: > > > > Fix "block" ACL by reverting accidental removal of code in > > 8ab2a364a8c8ad

Re: ACL block ignored in 2.0.25

ov 18, 2021 at 6:11 PM Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 05:59:24PM +0100, Bart van der Schans wrote: > > A bit more digging: > > > > It looks like this commit broke it: > > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-2.0.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ab2a364a8c8adf0965e

Re: ACL block ignored in 2.0.25

_rules.n; - LIST_INIT(>block_rules); - } Thanks Bart On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:47 PM Bart van der Schans wrote: > Hi good folks! > > We ran into an issue with 2.0.25 that it ignores the "block" (deprecated > but still valid) statement. The fol

ACL block ignored in 2.0.25

Hi good folks! We ran into an issue with 2.0.25 that it ignores the "block" (deprecated but still valid) statement. The following works in 2.0.24 but not in 2.0.25: frontend http-in bind :80 mode http logglobal // snip, all the usual stuff # block any unwanted

Re: How does http_find_header() work?

Hi, Thx Roxy, this would be very useful to have. I'm just wondering about the id format. If all the fields correspond to something meaningful, like host_id, pid, timestamp, etcetera, would it make sense to have them in a more human readable format? Regards, Bart On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:30 AM,

Haproxy monitoring with munin

Hi, A few days ago there's was some interest in munin plugins for haproxy. I have written a few plugins in perl. To code is fairly strait forward and should be quite easy to adjust to your needs. The four attached plugins are: - haproxy_check_duration: monitor the duration of the health checks

Re: QUEUEs and roundrobin balance

Hi Jose, A bit off topic, but may I ask how you created that nice graph? Bart On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Jose Avila(Tachu) ta...@crowdstar.com wrote: I have a theory on a recent issue i've been experiencing for the last 2 days that i would like some clarification on. I have a load

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.4-dev6 : many fixes

Hi Cyril, On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr wrote: Same here, I can't reproduce it. Bart, is it quickly reproducible or does it happen after a lot of traffic ? How much memory does haproxy use when it segfaults (I find the appsession timeout quite big) ?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.4-dev6 : many fixes

Hi Willy, Thanks for the quick response and the patch. I've applied the patch and it seems to be running fine now and I can't reproduce the segfault. Regards, Bart On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: Hi again Bart, I confirm that I forgot to reinit the session

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.4-dev6 : many fixes

Hi, First of all, I really like haproxy and I'm really exited about the keep-alive support! So I gave the new 1.4-dev6 spin, but I'm getting a segfault. When I run haproxy (with -d) in gdb I get: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00433cf9 in