Re: Support for Keep-Alive header and timeouts

Hi, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 25.04.2016 um 15:51 schrieb Craig McLure: >> >> >From a firewall perspective all sockets are configured to forcefully >> stop after about 20 minutes after which time a connection will go

Re: Support for Keep-Alive header and timeouts

obviously, I'd like for haproxy to have a way to close the connection as gracefully as possible after X minutes, rather than the current scenario where it may get killed ungracefully. Running v1.6.4 Cheers. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi. > > Am 25-0

Support for Keep-Alive header and timeouts

Hi, Does HAProxy support the Keep-Alive header, and a 'max connection duration' for Keep-Alive connections? I've poured through the manual, but can't see anything obvious, but it would be useful for better control over Keep-Alive connections. Thanks.

Re: Question about Keep-Alive behaviour

haproxy? Thanks. On 22 March 2016 at 20:44, Baptiste wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Craig McLure wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm hoping to experiment with enabling keep-alive on my service, but the > > documentation isn't entirely clear for my use ca

Question about Keep-Alive behaviour

ng style? Given that it's rare that two subsequent requests on a single connection will arrive at the same server, is it even worth having keep-alive support on the backends? Hopefully you guys can help. Thanks! -- Craig McLure