looked in the logs, but there's no mention of peering events
there either. The statistics report page makes no mention either.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
to be anything related to peering there.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
###
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
On 2016-02-12 22:46, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:54:53PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
I want to load balance and make sessions sticky based on the contents
of
a request header. In a nutshell, all requests with the same header
value
must go to, and stick to, the same backend
they will see different requests. But all I need is
that hash being computed exactly the same by both HAproxies, in a
deterministic fashion based on A) header values, and B) content of the
backend servers list.
Is that doable?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
a health check from an ELB? This
health check cannot be passed all the way to the backend web servers,
because they all answer different URL prefixes.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
7 19:05:49 haproxy-test haproxy-systemd-wrapper: [ALERT] 096/190549
(20038) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:66] : 'use_backend' not
allowed in 'defaults' section.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
indefinitely. At some
point, I'll run into some limits. What will dictate those limits? In
other words, how should I design the instance running HAproxy to make
sure I can increase maxconn to a very high value?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
8 matches
Mail list logo