Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2016, 09:23 +1000 schrieb Igor Cicimov:
On 29 Jun 2016 6:56 pm, "Gerd Mueller"
<gerd.muel...@mikatiming.de<mailto:gerd.muel...@mikatiming.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I am about to plan the update of our loadbalancing infrastructu
Hi list,
I am about to plan the update of our loadbalancing infrastructure. Before I
start I would like to get your comments and recommendations. Right now I would
like to install a two node cluster based on CentOS7 and haproxy 1.6. Because
SSL is more and more important the new setup should
wow!
Thanks, again
Gerd
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com>
An: Andrew Hayworth <andrew.haywo...@getbraintree.com>, Gerd Mueller
Kopie: haproxy@formilux.org <haproxy@formilux.org>
Betreff: Re: ssl offloading
Datum: Sun
Ok sounds good. Thanks for the input.
Gerd
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx>
An: Conrad Hoffmann <con...@soundcloud.com>
Kopie: Gerd Mueller <gerd.muel...@mikatiming.de>, haproxy@formilux.org
<haproxy@formilux.org>
Betreff:
Hi list,
what are your ideas about offloading of ssl? ssl inside haproxy is nice
but is very expensive. So I would like to offload the ssl to something
else.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gerd
Hi all,
just read in the documentation that map_str uses a balanced tree vs.
map_dom is using a list. So why should I use map_dom? Right now I am
using following:
use_backend
%[req.hdr(host),lower,map_dom(/etc/haproxy/hostname2backend.map,default
_backend)]
Would map_str improve the
Hi Willy,
I'm quite sure that either your frontend (or defaults) maxconn is limited,
please check your config, this should very likely be the reason.
I don't see any limit reached on frontend or backend. We had a lot of
traffic but not so much connections at this day. Could this be a
reason?
No, there clearly is no reason why you would have a direct relation
between traffic and concurrent connections. Are you sure your process
was not started as user and limited to 1024 fds when the issue appeared ?
I've checked /proc/`pidof haproxy`/limits
Limit Soft Limit
(bandwidth and connections) on Sunday and the graph showed no
difference. HAProsy's stats site gives me following values: system
limits: memmax = unlimited; ulimit-n = 60135
I wonder if I have a ulimit problem or not. Anybody andy thoughts?
Best wishes,
Gerd
--
Gerd Mueller
Föhrenhain 14
91154 roth
Forgot the chart ...
Gerd
--
Gerd Mueller
Föhrenhain 14
91154 roth
Phone: +49 (0)9171-60133
Fax: +49 (0)9171-60135
email: gmuel...@it4sport.de
WEB Adresse: blog.it4sport.de
Key ID: 6CC95F7C
Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2011, 09:21 +0200 schrieb Gerd Mueller:
Hi all,
Since Friday I am
10 matches
Mail list logo
