Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-29 Thread Jerome Magnin
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > Jérôme, > > Ilya, > > > > I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/885f64f

Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-23 Thread Jerome Magnin
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Jérôme, > Ilya, > > I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/885f64fb6da0a349dd3182d21d337b528225c517. > > > One example is here: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/169980019 > > It

Re: fullconn not working

2019-07-16 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Patrick, On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 09:40:31AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > > > > *From:* Pavlos Parissis [mailto:pavlos.paris...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019, 09:32 EDT > *To:* haproxy@formilux.org >

Re: Server IP address not being preserved from server state file

2019-07-11 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:15:19PM -0400, Shaun Tarves wrote: > Hi - > > I am trying to determine why my servers' IP address is not being preserved > through a reload when written to the server state file. I'm using version > 1.9.8 on alpine linux. > > CONFIGURATION: > global >

Re: http2-issue with http2 enabled on frontend and on backend

2019-02-26 Thread Jerome Magnin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:19:12AM +0100, Tom wrote: > Hi list > > When I enable health-checks on the backend, then the backend comes not up, > because of "Layer7 invalid response". The backend is a simple nginx with > http2 enabled. As I mentioned: When I directly talk to the backend with >

Re: http2-issue with http2 enabled on frontend and on backend

2019-02-26 Thread Jerome Magnin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:19:12AM +0100, Tom wrote: > Hi list > > I'm using haproxy-1.9.4 and trying to enable http2 in frontend and on one > backend server (nginx with http2 enabled). I'm always receiving a http/502 > from haproxy. I'm successfully able to directly talk to the backend with >

Re: DNS resolution issue with Docker swarm and HAProxy 1.8.15/1.9.0

2018-12-20 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Vincent, On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:22:25PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 20 décembre 2018 17:14 +01, Willy Tarreau : > > >> this is indeed a regression in haproxy. thanks for reporting it. > >> attached patch should fix it. > >> CC'ing Remi as the original author, and Baptiste, as DNS

Re: DNS resolution issue with Docker swarm and HAProxy 1.8.15/1.9.0

2018-12-20 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Leonhard Wimmer wrote: > Hello, > > We are running HAProxy in our Docker (18.09.0) swarm and we are relying on > the Docker embedded DNS server for service discovery. > > The backend servers are configured to resolve the IP addresses via a >

Re: sample fetch: add bc_http_major

2018-12-07 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Aleks, On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:46:53PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Jerome. > [...] > I suggest to use a dedicated function for that, jm2c. > > { "bc_http_major", smp_fetch_bc_http_major, 0, NULL, SMP_T_SINT, > SMP_USE_L4SRV }, > If you look at src/ssl_sock.c there are several

sample fetch: add bc_http_major

2018-12-07 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi, the attached patch adds bc_http_major. It returns the HTTP major encoding of the backend connection, based on the the on-wire encoding. Jérôme >From e0a28394ea2da5757c1e72773ab4c9fb97565a35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Magnin?= Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:03:11

Re: Difference between rspdel and http-response del-header use case?

2018-11-15 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi, On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 02:01:18PM +, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > Hello, > > > What is the difference between using one of the following rules instead > of the other? > > I think that rspdel is the historic way to do, but maybe it have other > implications. > > > rspdel ^Server.* > > or

Re: Combine different ACLs under same name

2018-10-05 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hello, On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:46:20AM +0200, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > Hello, > > > I have tested that some types of acls can't be combined, as example: > > Server 192.138.1.1, acl with combined rules: > > acl rule1 hdr_dom(host) -i test.com > acl rule1 src 192.168.1.2/24 >

Re: srv_is_up : unable to find server.

2018-06-05 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Brent, On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:18:36PM +0200, Brent Clark wrote: > Good day Guys > > I am at a total loss, and Im hoping someone on this list, would be so kind > to review my setup. > > I am trying to get haproxy to monitor redis / sentinel. But I keep getting. > > [WARNING] 155/110602

Re: Use SNI with healthchecks

2018-04-23 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Vincent, On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:38:32PM +, GALLISSOT VINCENT wrote: > Hi all, > > > I want to use SNI with httpchk on HAProxy 1.7.10 to connect to CloudFront > distributions as backend servers. > > I saw in this mailing-list archives that SNI is not used by default even when >

Re: Alpn in debian/ubuntu ppa 1.8

2018-01-25 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Igor, On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:26:14PM +1100, Igor Cicimov wrote: > Hi, > > I was testing haproxy 1.8 from the ppa repository and noticed it is not > build with alpn support so just wonder why? what's the output of haproxy -vv ? Jérôme