On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Илья Шипицин wrote:
> instead of disabling Lua support, is it possible to build against Lua-5.3 ?
> I recall there's Lua-5.3 on Fedora-33
>
Right. I saw the same message, but it does not work. I sent a message to
the Lua maintainer for Fedora last Friday and he
instead of disabling Lua support, is it possible to build against Lua-5.3 ?
I recall there's Lua-5.3 on Fedora-33
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 21:20, Ryan O'Hara :
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
>> Ryan,
>>
>> Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
>> > I'm currently
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:17:33AM -0500, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> > Ryan,
> >
> > Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> > > I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> > > Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> > I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> > Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any new build options or dependencies to
> be
> > aware of? I'm looking at the
Ryan,
Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any new build options or dependencies to be
> aware of? I'm looking at the Makefile now and nothing jumps out at me. That
> said, I am
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:34:40PM -0500, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > HAProxy 2.2.0 was released on 2020/07/07. It added 24 new commits
> > after version 2.2-dev12.
> >
>
> This is great. Thank you to all who contributed
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.2.0 was released on 2020/07/07. It added 24 new commits
> after version 2.2-dev12.
>
This is great. Thank you to all who contributed to this release.
I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 07:53:51PM +0200, Luke Seelenbinder wrote:
> > We would then pick from the first
> > list and if it's empty, then the next one.
>
> This slightly concerns me. Hopefully I'm just not quite understanding the
> behavior.
>
> Would that imply request A would pick from the
Hi Willy,
Thanks for your tome treatment of my ideas! I forgot how much I enjoyed reading
them. :)
>> To dig up an old discussion--I took a look at better support for SRV records
>> (using the priority field as backup/non-backup, etc.) a few weeks ago, but
>> determined it didn't make sense in
Hi Luke!
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:57:15AM +0200, Luke Seelenbinder wrote:
> I've been following along the torturous road, and I'm happy to see all the
> issues resolved and the excellent results.
You can imagine how I am as well :-)
> Personally, I'm excited about the
> performance gains.
Congrats on the release, Willy & the rest of the team!
I've been following along the torturous road, and I'm happy to see all the
issues resolved and the excellent results. Personally, I'm excited about the
performance gains. I'll deploy this soon on our network.
To dig up an old discussion—I
Hi,
HAProxy 2.2.0 was released on 2020/07/07. It added 24 new commits
after version 2.2-dev12.
There were very few last-minute changes since dev12, just as I hoped,
that's pretty fine.
We're late by about 1 month compared to the initial planning, which is
not terrible and should be seen instead
12 matches
Mail list logo
