-- Originalnachricht --
Von: "Marco Corte" <ma...@marcocorte.it>
An: haproxy@formilux.org
Gesendet: 03.01.2018 13:20:31
Betreff: Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?
Hello.
My vote to drop support for version 1.4
+1
.marcoc
regards
Aleks
Hello.
My vote to drop support for version 1.4
.marcoc
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 08:50 πμ, Maximilian Böhm wrote:
>> Debian (Jessie) distributes Haproxy 1.5.8.3
>>
>
> Well, Debian users can also use https://haproxy.debian.net/ to get any
> version they want.
> For more
On 03/01/2018 08:50 πμ, Maximilian Böhm wrote:
> Debian (Jessie) distributes Haproxy 1.5.8.3
>
Well, Debian users can also use https://haproxy.debian.net/ to get any version
they want.
For more details, please read
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=jessie-backports=names=haproxy
Cheers,
m.com>
Cc: haproxy <haproxy@formilux.org>
Betreff: RE: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?
Unfortunately, Red Hat continues to distribute 1.5 in RHEL 7.
How do we get them to upgrade to 1.7 ?
From: Falco Schmutz / premaccess [mailto:fschm...@premaccess.com]
Sent: January-02-18 10:27 AM
To: Jonat
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:09:50PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 02.01.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Oh bad, you're right. I wanted to even remove the "main features" part as
> > it's been totally outdated now. This page starts to age a lot. I really
> > think we should
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 02.01.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Just checked there and not only I can only see "alpine" there, there's no
> > single mention of debian on the page. Do you have another URL that I should
> > add maybe ?
>
Willy,
Am 02.01.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Oh bad, you're right. I wanted to even remove the "main features" part as
> it's been totally outdated now. This page starts to age a lot. I really
> think we should replace it all with a wiki so that many more people could
> participate to
Willy,
Am 02.01.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Just checked there and not only I can only see "alpine" there, there's no
> single mention of debian on the page. Do you have another URL that I should
> add maybe ?
>
The ones without a "specifier" are the Debian based ones. This is a
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> The sustainability of haproxy is linked to the amount of work you (and
> a /relatively/ small set of people) both have to do and want to do.
> I would very much like it to continue happily, so I would vote to
> reduce your mental
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:53:00PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > And while you're at it: The "Alpine-based Docker images" link in the
> > side bar technically should be named "Alpine / Debian-based Docker
> > images", but this probably does not fit in.
>
> I can place two links, one with Alpine
Hi Tim!
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:28:37PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 02.01.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be
> > enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained.
> >
>
> Don't forget to update
ct: Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?
Yes Jonathan is right, do mark 'unmaintained' or remove it anyway 8 years...
1.5 also can be remove or unmaintained as well.
Cheers ! And Happy New Year :-)
On 2 January 2018 at 16:23, Jonathan Matthews
<cont...@jpluscplusm.com<mailto:cont...@jpluscplusm
ent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 4:34:39 PM
To: Jonathan Matthews; haproxy
Subject: Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?
On 02/01/2018 04:23 μμ, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
>> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please
On 02/01/2018 04:23 μμ, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be
>> enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained.
>
> I don't use 1.4, but I do have a small
Yes Jonathan is right, do mark 'unmaintained' or remove it anyway 8 years...
1.5 also can be remove or unmaintained as well.
Cheers ! And Happy New Year :-)
On 2 January 2018 at 16:23, Jonathan Matthews
wrote:
> On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau
On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be
> enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained.
I don't use 1.4, but I do have a small reason to say please *do* mark
it as unmaintained.
The
Hi all,
while looking at what fixes to backport into older versions, I noticed
that 1.4 hasn't received a single fix over the last two years and that
apparently nobody's complaining (I'm pretty confident that the vast
majority of recent bugs did not even impact it).
This branch is already tagged
18 matches
Mail list logo