Re: FW: HAProxy: Information request

2020-02-27 Thread Sander Klein 

Hi,

please be aware you are posting to a public mailinglist. You might want
to check where you sent your emails.

Regards,

Sander Klein



On 2020-02-27 22:14, EMEA Request wrote:

Hi Team,

Apologies for delayed response.

Can you please help with the details provided below and provide a
quote.

Thanks and Regards,

 [3]

 Anandita Sharma | Procurement Specialist –GSDC| SoftwareONE

 anandita.sha...@softwareone.com [4]  | www.softwareone.com [3]
 Phone no : +91 8950320646

 Check out: Why SoftwareONE? [8] | PyraCloud [9] | Customer
Transformation [10]

From: Parsons, Branden 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 8:14 PM
To: Sharma, Anandita 
Subject: RE: HAProxy: Information request

Hi Anandita

Please see below

On AWS,  but not sure on the number of connections, can they get a
quote without knowing that? We will set up a call once we have an idea
of price?

With kind regards,

Branden Parsons

Internal Sales Executive

SoftwareONE UK Ltd

Direct. +44 203 3729 481

From: Sharma, Anandita 
Sent: 24 February 2020 14:16
To: Parsons, Branden 
Subject: FW: HAProxy: Information request

Hi Branden,

FYI

 [3]

 Anandita Sharma | Procurement Specialist –GSDC| SoftwareONE

 anandita.sha...@softwareone.com [4]  | www.softwareone.com [3]
 Phone no : +91 8950320646

 Check out: Why SoftwareONE? [8] | PyraCloud [9] | Customer
Transformation [10]

From: Anamarija Murgic 
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 7:23 PM
To: EMEA Request 
Cc: Sean Meroth 
Subject: Re: HAProxy: Information request

Hi Anandita,

Thanks for letting me know.

Have a great weekend!

Best,
Anamarija

On 17/01/2020 1:34 PM, EMEA Request wrote:


Hi Anamarija ,

Apologies for delay in reply.

Our team is in contact with customer for some clarifications.

Will get back to you after clarifying.

Thanks and Regards,

[3]

Anandita Sharma | Procurement Specialist –GSDC| SoftwareONE

anandita.sha...@softwareone.com [4]  | www.softwareone.com [3]
Phone no : +91 8950320646

Check out: Why SoftwareONE? [5] | PyraCloud [6] | Customer
Transformation [7]

From: Anamarija Murgic 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:20 PM
To: Sharma, Anandita 
Cc: Sean Meroth 
Subject: Re: HAProxy: Information request

Hello Anandita,

I am following up on my previous email as I haven't heard back from
you. Please let me know when is a good time to talk?

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Thanks,
Anamarija

On 07/01/2020 6:08 PM, Anamarija Murgic wrote:


Hi Anandita,

My colleagues forwarded me your email request sent to our Open
source email asking for the product information.

We have both, ALOHA LB, virtual or hardware and we have our
software only HAProxy Enterprise Edition (HAPEE) that you would
install on your their own infrastructure.  HAProxy Enterprise
Edition (HAPEE) comes as an annual subscription per server while
ALOHA appliances prices are based on the application performance
you need to sustain.

It would be very helpful to know:

- Are they using current appliance on Azure or AWS
- The number of new connections (HTTP or HTTPS) per second
- The number of concurrent connections per second.

Also, if possible at all, if you can share with us their current
ADC configuration.

In general, we've found that it's best to get some more context in
a quick conference call that will help us understand the use case
of TheTrainline.com. Then we can make the best recommendation for
you and the project and go over pricing.

Please let me know your availability this week, tomorrow or Friday
afternoon?

Thanks,
Anamarija

--

Anamarija Murgic

Sr. Account Executive

HAProxy Technologies - Powering your uptime!

15 Avenue Raymond Aron | 92160 Antony, France

+385 99 44 11 521 | www.haproxy.com [1] | Unsubscribe [2]


--

Anamarija Murgic

Sr. Account Executive

HAProxy Technologies - Powering your uptime!

15 Avenue Raymond Aron | 92160 Antony, France

+385 99 44 11 521 | www.haproxy.com [1] | Unsubscribe [2]


--

Anamarija Murgic

Sr. Account Executive

HAProxy Technologies - Powering your uptime!

15 Avenue Raymond Aron | 92160 Antony, France

+385 99 44 11 521 | www.haproxy.com [11] | Unsubscribe [12]

Links:
--
[1]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.haproxy.com_d=DwMDaQc=-5LgSL_TkF3nGRQI95ci6eeFVMQ5VESHPf5koMIAxOAr=t_QP427c6yP1s5t47wSRYPnCW5oQW71pV6vHdqbRap8m=SdHBecwJYxDvk1OEHAJB19YxCUoN___V5z6l1bRc8Dws=VjsyrZ9hejKpS-zBGVukDcHhAXXYjJsF8nVP92Ocg6Ue>
 [2]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.haproxy.com_manage-2Demail-2Dpreferences_d=DwMDaQc=-5LgSL_TkF3nGRQI95ci6eeFVMQ5VESHPf5koMIAxOAr=t_QP427c6yP1s5t47wSRYPnCW5oQW71pV6vHdqbRap8m=SdHBecwJYxDvk1OEHAJB19YxCUoN___V5z6l1bRc8DwsgFR5QK4GXUhO2mbkb-MDVmXX-OZjVZlHwRZsF3UOBUe>
 [3] http://www.softwareone.com/
[4] http://@softwareone.com
[5]

Re: FW: HAProxy??

2019-07-11 Thread Bruno Henc 
Hello Austin, for any sales inquiries regarding HAProxy Enterprise 
Edition please contact sales @ haproxy . com or use


the webform at https://www.haproxy.com/contact-us/ .

The mailing list is for the discussion of HAProxy Community Edition.

I have forward your email to the sales team which will reach out to you 
with further information.


Regards,

On 7/11/19 3:15 PM, Austin Getz wrote:


Hello Team,

Can you please provide two quotes for the below for ETS?




--
Bruno Henc
Support Engineer
HAProxy Technologies - Powering your uptime!
375 Totten Pond Road, Suite 302 | Waltham, MA 02451, US
+1 (844) 222-4340 | www.haproxy.com

Re: FW: HAProxy??

2019-07-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic 
Dear Austin Getz.

Am 11.07.2019 um 15:15 schrieb Austin Getz:
> Hello Team,
> 
> Can you please provide two quotes for the below for ETS?
> 
> ETS Needs to purchase the Enterprise Edition of HA Proxy
> (https://www.haproxy.com/products/haproxy-enterprise-edition/) so that we have
> support from the vendor and can maintain high availability in AWS. We will
> require two licenses: one for PROD and one for non-PROD – quantities subject 
> to
> change.

I strongly suggest to contact cont...@haproxy.com for the enterprise edition.

Fyi: this is the public mailing list for the OSS project.

Current Archive: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/

> Thank you.

Best regards
Aleks

> *Austin Getz *| SHI International Corp |Inside Account Manager |
> austin_g...@shi.com | _www.shi.com_
> 
> Office:732-868-8910 | Fax: 732-868-8911
> 
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-05-01_SHI.jpg
> 
> 
> */Innovative Solutions. World Class Support./**/ /* 
> 
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-02-21_Connect.pnghttps://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-02-21_Facebook.png
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-02-21_Twitter.png
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-02-21_LinkedIn.png
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-02-21_RSS.png
> https://myshi.com/marketing/companystandards/PublishingImages/2014-05-01_YouTube.png
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> This message has originated from an *External Source*. Please use proper
> judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding 
> to
> this email.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Tom,
> 
>  
> 
> ETS Needs to purchase the Enterprise Edition of HA Proxy
> (https://www.haproxy.com/products/haproxy-enterprise-edition/) so that we have
> support from the vendor and can maintain high availability in AWS. We will
> require two licenses: one for PROD and one for non-PROD – quantities subject 
> to
> change.
> 
>  
> 
> Do you work with HAProxy?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Glenn
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it 
> is
> intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any 
> action
> in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your 
> system.
> Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you for your compliance.
> 
>

Re: RE : FW: HAProxy

2015-10-11 Thread Willy Tarreau 
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 04:48:41AM +, Cédric Petter wrote:
> Thanks Willy and thanks Thierry Fournier too (He answers some days before and
> didn't get the time to test before)
> 
> It work like a charm now :-)

Great!

> It's weird but no blogs speaks about this. All blogs I found do redirect to
> 80 on backend. Or they use 443 but there is nothing in the config explained
> :-(

Well maybe that leaves an opportunity for you to post a blog article
somewhere. Also, please keep in mind that the documentation is supposed
to be used before blogs, although I admit it's a bit large now and I
understand why some people prefer too look for a blog post before reading
all the doc!

Regards,
Willy

RE : FW: HAProxy

2015-10-11 Thread Cédric Petter 
Thanks Willy and thanks Thierry Fournier too (He answers some days before and 
didn't get the time to test before)

It work like a charm now :-)
It's weird but no blogs speaks about this. All blogs I found do redirect to 80 
on backend. Or they use 443 but there is nothing in the config explained :-(

So I really appreciate your help. 
It saves me some sleep hours :-)

Kind Regards

Cédric Petter
VP of Support & IT

BPA Solutions
Headquarters – Switzerland

Build Closer Relationships with SharePoint

p. +41 24 524 25 50
e. cedric.pet...@bpa-solutions.net


De : Willy Tarreau [w...@1wt.eu]
Date d'envoi : samedi 10 octobre 2015 08:12
À : Cédric Petter
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Objet : Re: FW: HAProxy

Hello Cédric,

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:56:41PM +, Cédric Petter wrote:
> Bonjour
>
> First of all, if I need to explain in English, please tell me.

Yes the list is in english, but I understood your problem so I'll
put out a quick summary and will respond :-)

> Je suis bloqué avec HAProxy sur une VM.
> J'ai un serveur Debian 8.2 avec HAProxy 1.5.14.
> Et "derrière", j'ai 2 serveurs Windows avec IIS 8.5 & SharePoint 2013.
>
> Cela fonctionne bien en HTTP, mais pas en HTTPS.
> avec HTTPS j'ai soit des erreurs 503 & 504 en altérnance.
> Si quelqu'un à une idée ca serait cool.

In short Cedric faces an issue where he gets errors 503/504 on haproxy
when passing HTTPS requests to IIS but that's OK with HTTP.

Cedric, the problem is that you are connecting to port 443 in clear
because you didnt specify "ssl" on the server lines :

   backend www-backend-https
 server www-1 192.168.1.2:443 check
 server www-2 192.168.1.3:443 check

Just add "ssl" at the end of the line and it will work better. You'll
get a warning upon startup that you need to add "ssl-verify-none" or
to put a CA file. If haproxy and the servers are on the same local
network and you consider this network to be safe, you can easily add
that option.

Additionnally, maybe you don't even need to pass again via port 443
and you can pass everything to port 80 ? That can make a simpler
config and avoid to re-encrypt+decrypt.

Last, since you're on haproxy 1.5, if you're observing important
CPU usage when using SSL, you can enable HTTP keep-alive to the
servers by removing this line :

   option http-server-close

It will use more memory by maintaining more connections though.

Regards,
Willy

Re: FW: HAProxy

2015-10-10 Thread Willy Tarreau 
Hello Cédric,

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:56:41PM +, Cédric Petter wrote:
> Bonjour
> 
> First of all, if I need to explain in English, please tell me.

Yes the list is in english, but I understood your problem so I'll
put out a quick summary and will respond :-)

> Je suis bloqué avec HAProxy sur une VM.
> J'ai un serveur Debian 8.2 avec HAProxy 1.5.14.
> Et "derrière", j'ai 2 serveurs Windows avec IIS 8.5 & SharePoint 2013.
> 
> Cela fonctionne bien en HTTP, mais pas en HTTPS.
> avec HTTPS j'ai soit des erreurs 503 & 504 en altérnance.
> Si quelqu'un à une idée ca serait cool.

In short Cedric faces an issue where he gets errors 503/504 on haproxy
when passing HTTPS requests to IIS but that's OK with HTTP.

Cedric, the problem is that you are connecting to port 443 in clear
because you didnt specify "ssl" on the server lines :

   backend www-backend-https
 server www-1 192.168.1.2:443 check
 server www-2 192.168.1.3:443 check

Just add "ssl" at the end of the line and it will work better. You'll
get a warning upon startup that you need to add "ssl-verify-none" or
to put a CA file. If haproxy and the servers are on the same local
network and you consider this network to be safe, you can easily add
that option.

Additionnally, maybe you don't even need to pass again via port 443
and you can pass everything to port 80 ? That can make a simpler
config and avoid to re-encrypt+decrypt.

Last, since you're on haproxy 1.5, if you're observing important
CPU usage when using SSL, you can enable HTTP keep-alive to the
servers by removing this line :

   option http-server-close

It will use more memory by maintaining more connections though.

Regards,
Willy

Re: FW: haproxy conditional healthchecks/failover

2012-05-29 Thread Willy Tarreau 
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:32:29PM +, Zulu Chas wrote:
 
 am I wildly off course or is this config salvageable?
 

To be honnest, your mail with overly long lines (half a kilobyte) is painful
to read, and once I made the effort of reading it, I didn't understand why
you're trying to cross-dress something which already exists and works.
 
The disable-on-404 is made to permit enabling/disabling a server by a simple
touch or rm. It appears that you want to exactly swap these two commands,
it really makes no sense to me to modify haproxy to support such a swap in a
script.

Another reason for disabling on 404 is that it will not accidently enable a
server which was started from an unmounted docroot file system. With your
method, it would still start it.

Also, the suggested way of dealing with very specific health checks is to
write a CGI or servlet to handle the various situations. Most people are
already doing this, and if you absolutely want to use rm to start the
server and touch to stop it, then 5 lines of shell in a CGI will do it.

Regards,
Willy