sob., 21 lis 2020 o 07:13 Willy Tarreau napisał(a):
> So I guess we'll use you as a beta tester once we're starting to see
> promising solutions ;-)
>
I'll test it happily :)
Hi Maciej,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> So "# some headers manipulation, nothing different then on other clusters"
> was the important factor in config. Under this comment I've hidden from you
> one of our LUA scripts that is doing header
Tim.
Cool big thank to clarify that for me.
Regards
Aleks
On 19.11.20 17:03, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Aleks,
Am 19.11.20 um 16:53 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
When a H2 client send the header in lowercase then and h1 in mixed-case
could the "del-header"
line not match when it's only written in
Aleks,
Am 19.11.20 um 16:53 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
> When a H2 client send the header in lowercase then and h1 in mixed-case
> could the "del-header"
> line not match when it's only written in lowercase or mixed-case .
HTTP headers are defined to be case-insensitive. You quoted it yourself:
Hi.
On 19.11.20 16:16, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
Hi,
Alaksandar I've looked into code and... :)
Great ;-)
śr., 18 lis 2020 o 15:30 Aleksandar Lazic mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> napisał(a):
Can you think to respectthe '-i'.
Hi,
Alaksandar I've looked into code and... :)
śr., 18 lis 2020 o 15:30 Aleksandar Lazic napisał(a):
> Can you think to respectthe '-i'.
>
> http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git=search=HEAD=grep=PAT_MF_IGNORE_CASE
>
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but in case of http-request
Maciej,
Am 18.11.20 um 18:48 schrieb Maciej Zdeb:
> Tim thanks for the hint!
You're welcome.
> Aleksandar I’ll do my best, however I’m still learning HAProxy internals
> and refreshing my C skills after very long break. ;) First, I’ll try to
> deliver something simple like „-m beg” and after
Tim thanks for the hint!
Aleksandar I’ll do my best, however I’m still learning HAProxy internals
and refreshing my C skills after very long break. ;) First, I’ll try to
deliver something simple like „-m beg” and after review from the team we’ll
see.
If someone is in hurry with this issue and
Maciej,
Am 18.11.20 um 14:22 schrieb Maciej Zdeb:
> I've found an earlier discussion about replacing reqidel (and others) in
> 2.x: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg36321.html
>
> So basically we're lacking:
> http-request del-header x-private- -m beg
> http-request
Hi Maciej.
On 18.11.20 14:22, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
I've found an earlier discussion about replacing reqidel (and others) in 2.x: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg36321.html
So basically we're lacking:
http-request del-header x-private- -m beg
http-request del-header
I've found an earlier discussion about replacing reqidel (and others) in
2.x: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg36321.html
So basically we're lacking:
http-request del-header x-private- -m beg
http-request del-header x-.*company -m reg
http-request del-header -tracea -m
Sure, the biggest problem is to delete header by matching prefix:
load_blacklist = function(service)
local prefix = '/etc/haproxy/configs/maps/header_blacklist'
local blacklist = {}
blacklist.req = {}
blacklist.res = {}
blacklist.req.str =
On 18 Nov 12:33, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> So "# some headers manipulation, nothing different then on other clusters"
> was the important factor in config. Under this comment I've hidden from you
> one of our LUA scripts that is doing header manipulation like deleting all
> headers from
13 matches
Mail list logo
