On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:40:02AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> ping :) is the mailing list still the way for patches or is github more
> appropriate for better traceability ?
The mailing list is still preferred for patches, but I previously
got the impression that you resent the same. Better
ping :) is the mailing list still the way for patches or is github more
appropriate for better traceability ?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 13:37, David CARLIER wrote:
> I sent a new one after, resending in case it got lost.
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 12:36, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> On
I sent a new one after, resending in case it got lost.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 12:36, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> David,
>
> On 11/7/22 09:00, David CARLIER wrote:
> > Thanks here a corrected version.
> >
>
> It looks like you accidentally attached the same patch as before.
>
> Best regards
> Tim
David,
On 11/7/22 09:00, David CARLIER wrote:
Thanks here a corrected version.
It looks like you accidentally attached the same patch as before.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
.
>
> Thanks. I'm having a few comments below.
>
> > From be693024d7e49173f7ff37566232238fc5ea1887 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: David CARLIER
> > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 19:24:03 +
> > Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: insecure-setuid-wanted support on Free
gt; From: David CARLIER
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 19:24:03 +
> Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: insecure-setuid-wanted support on FreeBSD.
>
> using the procctl api to ignore the suid/sgid bits to be ignored.
> ---
> src/haproxy.c | 11 +--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+),
Hi,
here a little patch to port the insecure-setuid-wanted directive on FreeBSD.
Cheers.
0001-BUILD-insecure-setuid-wanted-support-on-FreeBSD.patch
Description: Binary data
7 matches
Mail list logo
