Hi Pieter,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:02:13PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Made a new version of it with a bit of extra comments inside the code,
> removed a unrelated white-space change, and added a matching patch
> description.
OK, now applied, thank you!
Willy
create it under his own name? Either way is
fine for me. :)
Regards,
PiBa-NL / Pieter
From 3129e1ae21e41a026f6d067b3658f6643835974c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PiBa-NL <pba_...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 01:35:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: email-alert: don't set server
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:27:16PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Honestly, I don't know which version is the best.
Just let me know guys :-)
> Email alerts should
> probably be rewritten to not use the checks. This was the only solution to
> do connections by hand when Simon implemented it.
ieter
>
>> From bf80b0398c08f94bebec30feaaddda422cb87ba1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: PiBa-NL <pba_...@yahoo.com>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 01:35:43 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: email-alert: don't set server check status from
>> a
>> email-ale
or should be done differently.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> PiBa-NL / Pieter
> From bf80b0398c08f94bebec30feaaddda422cb87ba1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: PiBa-NL <pba_...@yahoo.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 01:35:43 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: email-alert:
-alert: don't set server check status from a
email-alert task
This avoids possible 100% cpu usage deadlock on a EMAIL_ALERTS_LOCK and avoids
sending lots of emails when 'option log-health-checks' is used.
It is avoided to change the server state and possibly queue a new email while
processing the
6 matches
Mail list logo