Re: [PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-08-06 Thread Илья Шипицин
пн, 1 авг. 2022 г. в 22:40, Tim Düsterhus : > Ilya, > > On 7/29/22 20:25, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > not sure. it is not 32 bit, it is 32 bit built on x86_64. > > but I'm fine with "32 Bits" > > > > My understanding is that the primary thing that this tests is the > pointer / maximum object size.

Re: [PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-08-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 07:40:43PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > The updated patches LGTM. Thanks guys, now applied! Willy

Re: [PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-08-01 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Ilya, On 7/29/22 20:25, Илья Шипицин wrote: not sure. it is not 32 bit, it is 32 bit built on x86_64. but I'm fine with "32 Bits" My understanding is that the primary thing that this tests is the pointer / maximum object size. That shouldn't change depending on the architecture as I

Re: [PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-07-29 Thread Илья Шипицин
пт, 29 июл. 2022 г. в 22:48, Tim Düsterhus : > Ilya, > > On 7/29/22 18:53, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > another exotic (but hopefully useful) CI job. > > > > In the first patch you have an indentation mixup. The script uses > spaces, but the modified line now uses tabs. This will look incorrectly >

Re: [PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-07-29 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Ilya, On 7/29/22 18:53, Илья Шипицин wrote: another exotic (but hopefully useful) CI job. In the first patch you have an indentation mixup. The script uses spaces, but the modified line now uses tabs. This will look incorrectly depending on the tab width. For the second patch: +name:

[PATCH] CI: enable weekly "m32" builds

2022-07-29 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hello, another exotic (but hopefully useful) CI job. Ilya From d6185a3e972c0e04d86e8b7ddc075a08d115031a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Shipitsin Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:42:12 +0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] BUILD: SSL: allow to pass additional configure args to QUICTLS this allows to pass