On 06/11/2017 03:19 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Pavlos,
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:09:10PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> That will be very much appreciated as it will allow us to have a smooth
>> migration to the new master process model.
>
> In fact the current behaviour is to continue
On 06/11/2017 01:35 μμ, William Lallemand wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:11:13PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> On 06/11/2017 11:16 πμ, William Lallemand wrote:
>>> The parent process supervises itself the children, we don't need to
>>> store the children pids anymore in the pidfile in
On 06/11/2017 11:16 πμ, William Lallemand wrote:
> The parent process supervises itself the children, we don't need to
> store the children pids anymore in the pidfile in master-worker mode.
I have a small objection against this. Having PIDs in a file allows external
tools to monitor the
The parent process supervises itself the children, we don't need to
store the children pids anymore in the pidfile in master-worker mode.
---
src/haproxy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/haproxy.c b/src/haproxy.c
index bcbbad4a1..4d4bd3b26 100644
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
