On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 12:15 AM William Lallemand
wrote:
> That's a remain of the previous way of doing this, which was done with an
> array of 2 old_ckch, so the previous check was something like:
>
> > if (!old_ckchs[0] && !old_ckchs[1])
>
> When a transaction is created the old_ckchs and the
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 10:44:31PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> we were checking two times old_ckchs where we wanted to check whether
> the transaction path was freed (and so null) before
>
> this should fix issue #351
>
> Reported-by: Илья Шипицин
> Signed-off-by: William Dauchy
> ---
>
we were checking two times old_ckchs where we wanted to check whether
the transaction path was freed (and so null) before
this should fix issue #351
Reported-by: Илья Шипицин
Signed-off-by: William Dauchy
---
src/ssl_sock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
3 matches
Mail list logo