Hi Bertrand,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:00:14PM +, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Yep, all of this sounds legit. Please find attache a new patch serie
> attempting to address all your concerns.
Perfect and fairly complete, thank you! I've just applied them both.
Cheers,
Willy
Hi all,
On 05/02/2019 05:37, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi guys,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:13:11PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Since TLS ciphers are not well understand, it is very common parameters
> from documentation are used as is. Since RC4 should not be used anymore
> I believe it is wiser
Hi guys,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:13:11PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > Since TLS ciphers are not well understand, it is very common parameters
> > from documentation are used as is. Since RC4 should not be used anymore
> > I believe it is wiser to show example including stronger ciphers to
>
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 20:48, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>
> Since TLS ciphers are not well understand, it is very common parameters
> from documentation are used as is. Since RC4 should not be used anymore
> I believe it is wiser to show example including stronger ciphers to
> avoid
Since TLS ciphers are not well understand, it is very common parameters
from documentation are used as is. Since RC4 should not be used anymore
I believe it is wiser to show example including stronger ciphers to
avoid deploying unsafe configuration in the wild.
"ALL" is also to avoid since it
5 matches
Mail list logo
