Re: Aw: Re: [RFC] Wireshark dissector for SPOP

2018-03-14 Thread Frederic Lecaille
Hi Danny, On 03/13/2018 09:05 PM, my.card@web.de wrote: Thanks for your hint, but I couldn't find a good heuristic to distinguish SPOP from TCP. I think, that the current implementation is usable enough for development purposes. Feel free to enhance it. :-) Ok. Do not hesitate to send a

Aw: Re: [RFC] Wireshark dissector for SPOP

2018-03-13 Thread My . Card . God
Thanks for your hint, but I couldn't find a good heuristic to distinguish SPOP from TCP. I think, that the current implementation is usable enough for development purposes. Feel free to enhance it. :-)   There is a Wireshark feature called "Decode as...", where you can choose the SPOP dissector

Re: Aw: Re: [RFC] Wireshark dissector for SPOP

2017-11-19 Thread Frederic Lecaille
Hi Danny, So I had a look at this issue which is easily reproducible. See my answer below. On 11/12/2017 07:43 PM, my.card@web.de wrote: Hi, I've figured it out, it has been a feature of the dissector code. Perhaps it might be useful for someone developing her own SPOA. Kind regards,   

Aw: Re: [RFC] Wireshark dissector for SPOP

2017-11-12 Thread My . Card . God
Hi,   I've figured it out, it has been a feature of the dissector code. Perhaps it might be useful for someone developing her own SPOA.   Kind regards,     Danny   Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. November 2017 um 16:07 Uhr Von: "Frederic Lecaille" An: my.card@web.de, haproxy@formilux.or