On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> I've taken the usage from your commit message in commit
> e736115d3aaa38d2cfc89fe74174d7e90f4a6976 :-)
>
Oh right, I edited the usage message in this patch but I forgot to edit the
commit message when I rebased my patches :(
--
William,
Am 25.11.18 um 19:33 schrieb William Lallemand:
> We can safely add an if > -1 instead of an assert there. So you can edit your
> patch if you want :-)
There should be an updated patch in this thread now.
> By the way, the right option is '-S' and not '-Sa', I know it's not yet on the
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 06:30:19PM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Valgrind reports an invalid close of file descriptor -1. After this
> patch haproxy that is started with:
>
> ./haproxy -d -Sa /scratch/haproxy/cli.sock -Ws -f ./haproxy.cfg
>
> aborts in the child process to outline the place
Valgrind reports an invalid close of file descriptor -1. After this
patch haproxy that is started with:
./haproxy -d -Sa /scratch/haproxy/cli.sock -Ws -f ./haproxy.cfg
aborts in the child process to outline the place where the bug needs
to be fixed.
Best regards
---
src/haproxy.c | 2 ++
1
4 matches
Mail list logo