On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:53:44AM -0600, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> > Spec file can run configuration check(-f -c) after installation
> > and print a warning if configuration is in valid.
>
> I'm well aware, but I'm the package maintainer so I don't have all the
> config files to test. :) Thanks!
By the way, there are no 'appsession' any more :)
Baptiste
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> By the way, there are no 'appsession' any more :)
Thanks, Baptiste!
Ryan
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>
>
> On 06/01/2016 08:49 πμ, Baptiste wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> >>
> >> Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for
> >> haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6?
On 06/01/2016 08:49 πμ, Baptiste wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
>>
>> Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for
>> haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is
>> valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid
Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for
haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is
valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid in 1.6? I'm asking because I am
considering a rebase of haproxy 1.6 in Fedora/RHEL but need to avoid
such issues. If I recall,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
>
> Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for
> haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is
> valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid in 1.6? I'm asking because I am
> considering a
7 matches
Mail list logo