Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:53:44AM -0600, Ryan O'Hara wrote: > > Spec file can run configuration check(-f -c) after installation > > and print a warning if configuration is in valid. > > I'm well aware, but I'm the package maintainer so I don't have all the > config files to test. :) Thanks!

Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-06 Thread Baptiste
By the way, there are no 'appsession' any more :) Baptiste

Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-06 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Baptiste wrote: > By the way, there are no 'appsession' any more :) Thanks, Baptiste! Ryan

Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-06 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > > On 06/01/2016 08:49 πμ, Baptiste wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: > >> > >> Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for > >> haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6?

Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-06 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 06/01/2016 08:49 πμ, Baptiste wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: >> >> Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for >> haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is >> valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid

Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-05 Thread Ryan O'Hara
Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid in 1.6? I'm asking because I am considering a rebase of haproxy 1.6 in Fedora/RHEL but need to avoid such issues. If I recall,

Re: Config file compatibility between 1.5 and 1.6

2016-01-05 Thread Baptiste
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: > > Are there any known incompatibilities between a config file for > haproxy version 1.5 and 1.6? Specifically, is there anything that is > valid in 1.5 that is no longer valid in 1.6? I'm asking because I am > considering a