Hi Joel,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:10:53PM -0800, Joel Krauska wrote:
> On 2/7/11 1:01 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
> >>>Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
> >>>because it's not very easy to implement with tab
On 2/7/11 1:01 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all act
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
> > Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
> > because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
> > since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all active
> > servers' weights. Thus
> Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
> because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
> since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all active
> servers' weights. Thus adding a new server will change the size of
> the table.
>
> It's
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:30:03PM -0800, carlo flores wrote:
> Your last suggestion is what are suits call auto-scaling, and the idea of
> doing that with HAProxy is really appealing and would be a big plus for us.
>
>
> As a test tomorrow with 1.4.10/stable idea, let's say a pool of 10 servers
Your last suggestion is what are suits call auto-scaling, and the idea of
doing that with HAProxy is really appealing and would be a big plus for us.
As a test tomorrow with 1.4.10/stable idea, let's say a pool of 10 servers
had two servers with zero weight, and a script watching the unix socket
Hi Joel,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:04:40PM -0800, Joel Krauska wrote:
> Awesome - This is a great start.
>
> Putting a server in backup or primary mode would be a nice addition.
Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table
Try using Hatop...this will do all the things from your list
http://feurix.org/projects/hatop/
I am using it, and learning more about it now..
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Joel Krauska wrote:
From: Joel Krauska
Subject: Re: Configuration API?
To: "John Marrett"
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Da
nds"
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt
-JohnF
On 11-02-04 03:40 PM, Joel Krauska wrote:
Has there ever been effort in building out a configuration API for
HAProxy?
It would be nice to be able to tweak configs externally to do things.
(simpler things now, but obviously bein
Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:46 PM, John Marrett wrote:
> Check out section "9.2. Unix Socket commands"
>
> http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt
>
> -JohnF
>
>
> On 11-02-04 03:40 PM, Joel Krauska wrote:
>
>> Has there ever been effort in buil
Check out section "9.2. Unix Socket commands"
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt
-JohnF
On 11-02-04 03:40 PM, Joel Krauska wrote:
Has there ever been effort in building out a configuration API for
HAProxy?
It would be nice to be able to tweak configs extern
Has there ever been effort in building out a configuration API for HAProxy?
It would be nice to be able to tweak configs externally to do things.
(simpler things now, but obviously being able to tweak /ANY/ config
parameter might be nice down the road)
My wish list:
- put a server in backup
12 matches
Mail list logo
