Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:26:40AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
> From 370a74e89af0153a96ed8b7ebd4648258c89109e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Godbach
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:48:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: use the same check condition for server as other
> algorithms
(...)
On 2013/8/6 20:36, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Godbach,
>
> Sorry for replying late, I don't have a regular internet access at the
> moment.
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:48:46PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
>> It seems that static-rr should also use the same check condition for the
>> server after being
Hi Godbach,
Sorry for replying late, I don't have a regular internet access at the
moment.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:48:46PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
> It seems that static-rr should also use the same check condition for the
> server after being selected as roundrobin and leastconn as below:
>
> i
On 2013/8/1 17:05, Godbach wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Haproxy will check the number of concurrent sessions assigned to the
> server after being selected from lb trees. Both leastconn and roundrobin
> use the same condition as below:
>
> fwlc_get_next_server():
> if (!s->maxconn || (!s->nbpend && s->s
Hi Willy,
Haproxy will check the number of concurrent sessions assigned to the
server after being selected from lb trees. Both leastconn and roundrobin
use the same condition as below:
fwlc_get_next_server():
if (!s->maxconn || (!s->nbpend && s->served < srv_dynamic_maxconn(s))) {
if (s !
5 matches
Mail list logo
