Re: Does http-request worked with tunnel mode?

2014-03-14 Thread k simon 
 Is it possible add X-Foward-For for each request in http-tunnel mode ?

Simon


于 14-3-11 11:53, k simon 写道:
 Hi,List,
 
 I am puzzled with set a header for each request in tunnel mode.
 As I know, tunnel mode only analyze the first transaction. But the
 tcp-request content documented it can be evaluated again by the rules
 being evaluated again for the next request.
 As tcp-request content only can accept/reject or track sc1/sc2
 counter. Now the question, can http-request do the similar thing in
 the early stage ?
 
 P.S.
I found tcp-request content worked well with http-tunnel and
 httpclose. When using it with server-close or http-keep-alive, it
 would have lost of CLOSED\LAST-ACK states etc.
 
 Regards
 Simon

Re: Does http-request worked with tunnel mode?

2014-03-14 Thread Bryan Talbot 
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:11 AM, k simon chio1...@gmail.com wrote:

  Is it possible add X-Foward-For for each request in http-tunnel mode ?



Not in tunnel mode, no.

Does http-request worked with tunnel mode?

2014-03-10 Thread k simon 
Hi,List,

   I am puzzled with set a header for each request in tunnel mode.
As I know, tunnel mode only analyze the first transaction. But the
tcp-request content documented it can be evaluated again by the rules
being evaluated again for the next request.
   As tcp-request content only can accept/reject or track sc1/sc2
counter. Now the question, can http-request do the similar thing in
the early stage ?

P.S.
  I found tcp-request content worked well with http-tunnel and
httpclose. When using it with server-close or http-keep-alive, it
would have lost of CLOSED\LAST-ACK states etc.

Regards
Simon