Re: FW: HAProxy: Information request

2020-02-27 Thread Sander Klein
, Branden Parsons Internal Sales Executive SoftwareONE UK Ltd Direct. +44 203 3729 481 From: Sharma, Anandita Sent: 24 February 2020 14:16 To: Parsons, Branden Subject: FW: HAProxy: Information request Hi Branden, FYI [3] Anandita Sharma | Procurement Specialist –GSDC| SoftwareONE

FW: HAProxy: Information request

2020-02-27 Thread EMEA Request
To: Parsons, Branden mailto:branden.pars...@softwareone.com>> Subject: FW: HAProxy: Information request Hi Branden, FYI [cid:image002.jpg@01D5ED7C.621F1730]<http://www.softwareone.com/> Anandita Sharma | Procurement Specialist –GSDC| SoftwareONE anandita.sha...@softwareone.com

Re: FW: HAProxy??

2019-07-11 Thread Bruno Henc
Hello Austin, for any sales inquiries regarding HAProxy Enterprise Edition please contact sales @ haproxy . com or use the webform at https://www.haproxy.com/contact-us/ . The mailing list is for the discussion of HAProxy Community Edition. I have forward your email to the sales team which wil

Re: FW: HAProxy??

2019-07-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Dear Austin Getz. Am 11.07.2019 um 15:15 schrieb Austin Getz: > Hello Team, > > Can you please provide two quotes for the below for ETS? > > ETS Needs to purchase the Enterprise Edition of HA Proxy > (https://www.haproxy.com/products/haproxy-enterprise-edition/) so that we have > support from th

FW: HAProxy??

2019-07-11 Thread Austin Getz
Hello Team, Can you please provide two quotes for the below for ETS? ETS Needs to purchase the Enterprise Edition of HA Proxy (https://www.haproxy.com/products/haproxy-enterprise-edition/) so that we have support from the vendor and can maintain high availability in AWS. We will require two li

Fw: haproxy@formilux.org

2016-12-27 Thread Ralph

FW: haproxy log

2015-12-14 Thread Cohen Galit
Hello! Can you examine the logger below? I'm afraid I have a configuration problem in haproxy config, maybe in one of the timeout limits. These lines are printed only after load tests are starting to fail over tcp against 5 imap servers round robin. We are load testing over than 1M create soc

Re: RE : FW: HAProxy

2015-10-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 04:48:41AM +, Cédric Petter wrote: > Thanks Willy and thanks Thierry Fournier too (He answers some days before and > didn't get the time to test before) > > It work like a charm now :-) Great! > It's weird but no blogs speaks about this. All blogs I found do redirect

RE : FW: HAProxy

2015-10-11 Thread Cédric Petter
-solutions.net De : Willy Tarreau [w...@1wt.eu] Date d'envoi : samedi 10 octobre 2015 08:12 À : Cédric Petter Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Objet : Re: FW: HAProxy Hello Cédric, On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:56:41PM +, Cédric Petter wrote: > Bonjour > > First of all, if I need to exp

Re: FW: HAProxy

2015-10-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello Cédric, On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:56:41PM +, Cédric Petter wrote: > Bonjour > > First of all, if I need to explain in English, please tell me. Yes the list is in english, but I understood your problem so I'll put out a quick summary and will respond :-) > Je suis bloqué avec HAProxy

FW: HAProxy

2015-10-06 Thread Cédric Petter
Bonjour First of all, if I need to explain in English, please tell me. Je suis bloqué avec HAProxy sur une VM. J'ai un serveur Debian 8.2 avec HAProxy 1.5.14. Et "derrière", j'ai 2 serveurs Windows avec IIS 8.5 & SharePoint 2013. Cela fonctionne bien en HTTP, mais pas en HTTPS. avec HTTPS j'ai s

Re: FW: haproxy conditional healthchecks/failover

2012-05-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:32:29PM +, Zulu Chas wrote: > > am I wildly off course or is this config salvageable? > To be honnest, your mail with overly long lines (half a kilobyte) is painful to read, and once I made the effort of reading it, I didn't understand why you're trying to cross-dr

FW: haproxy conditional healthchecks/failover

2012-05-29 Thread Zulu Chas
am I wildly off course or is this config salvageable? > > Hi! > > > > I'm trying to use HAproxy to support the concepts of "offline", "in > > maintenance mode", and "not working" servers. > > Any good reason to do that??? > (I'm a bit curious) Sure. I want to be able to mark a machine off