Willy Tarreau wrote:
What would you consider a good indicator of its reliability? Would
running flawlessly for a week straight be enough of testing?
The fact that it runs a lot longer than previous run is a natural
indicator of reliability. However it's not an indicator of correctness.
I
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:54:13AM +0100, Dariusz Suchojad wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
What would you consider a good indicator of its reliability? Would
running flawlessly for a week straight be enough of testing?
The fact that it runs a lot longer than previous run is a
Hello,
first off - thank you very much for such a wonderful piece of software!
I'm using HAProxy on Linux/x86 and it's been a wonderful experience so far.
Things are a bit different on z/Linux, using s390 architecture. HAProxy
was running very nicely for several hours and then suddenly
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
There's something easy you can do to check if it's that : in
src/stream_sock.c, there's only one recv() call. Simply check
that the max value is within bounds :
+ if (max 0 || max b-size)
+ abort();
ret = recv(fd,
4 matches
Mail list logo
