On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, at 10:42, David King wrote:
> Just to close the loop on this, last night was the time at which we were
> expecting the next hang. All of the servers we updated haproxy to the
> patched versions did not hang. The test servers which were running the
> older version hung as expecte
Hi David,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:42:58AM +0100, David King wrote:
> Just to close the loop on this, last night was the time at which we were
> expecting the next hang. All of the servers we updated haproxy to the
> patched versions did not hang. The test servers which were running the
> older
Just to close the loop on this, last night was the time at which we were
expecting the next hang. All of the servers we updated haproxy to the
patched versions did not hang. The test servers which were running the
older version hung as expected
Thanks so much to everyone who fixed the issue!
On 1
Hi David,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:33:40AM +0100, David King wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Just like to confirm Willy's theory, we had the hang at exactly the time
> specified this morning.
I could recycle myself in a new church of which I would be the prophet...
well maybe it already exists, we have th
Hi All
Just like to confirm Willy's theory, we had the hang at exactly the time
specified this morning.
Sadly due to a bank holiday yesterday in the UK, we didn't set up the truss
and monitoring before the hang occurred.
Was the hang seen by everyone?
Thanks
Dave
On 6 April 2017 at 14:56, Mar
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:45:57 -0400, Dave Cottlehuber
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, at 13:31, David King wrote:
Hi All
Apologies for the delay in response, i've been out of the country for
the
last week
Mark, my gut feeling is that is network related in someway, so thought
we
could comp
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:10:49AM +0100, David King wrote:
> I'm going to keep with version 1.7.2 till then, so we should have a
> comparison
OK as you like :-)
> If we think we may have a hang at Tue Apr 18, 9:38, is there any specific
> logging we should set up on a server at that time?
Maybe
I'm going to keep with version 1.7.2 till then, so we should have a
comparison
If we think we may have a hang at Tue Apr 18, 9:38, is there any specific
logging we should set up on a server at that time? is it worth setting at
least one server to have nokqueue set at that time?
Thanks
David
On
Hi all,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:34:20AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Can we be absolutely positive that those hangs are not directly or
> indirectly caused by the bugs Willy already fixed in 1.7.4 and 1.7.5, for
> example from the ML thread "Problems with haproxy 1.7.3 on FreeBSD 11.0-p8"?
I d
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, at 01:34, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Am 05.04.2017 um 00:27 schrieb David King:
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > Thanks for the info, So interestingly we had the crash at exactly the
> > same time, so we are 3 for 3 on that
> >
> > The setups sounds very similar, but given we all
Hello,
Am 05.04.2017 um 00:27 schrieb David King:
Hi Dave
Thanks for the info, So interestingly we had the crash at exactly the
same time, so we are 3 for 3 on that
The setups sounds very similar, but given we all saw issue at the same
time, it really points to something more global.
We
Hi Dave
Thanks for the info, So interestingly we had the crash at exactly the same
time, so we are 3 for 3 on that
The setups sounds very similar, but given we all saw issue at the same
time, it really points to something more global.
We are using NTP from our firewalls, which in turn get it fro
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, at 13:31, David King wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Apologies for the delay in response, i've been out of the country for the
> last week
>
> Mark, my gut feeling is that is network related in someway, so thought we
> could compare the networking setup of our systems
>
> You mentioned
Hi All
Apologies for the delay in response, i've been out of the country for the
last week
Mark, my gut feeling is that is network related in someway, so thought we
could compare the networking setup of our systems
You mentioned you see the hang across geo locations, so i assume there
isn't laye
Willy,
per your comment on /dev/random exhaustion. I think running haveged on
servers doing crypto work is/should be best practice.
jerry
On 3/6/17 12:02 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Mark S wrote:
As for the timing issue, I can add to the discu
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:02:43 -0500, Willy Tarreau wrote:
OK so that means that haproxy could have hung in a day or two, then your
case is much more common than one of the other reports. If your fdront LB
is fair between the 6 servers, that could be related to a total number of
requests or conne
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Mark S wrote:
> As for the timing issue, I can add to the discussion with a few related data
> points. In short, system uptime does not seem to be a commonality to my
> situation.
thanks!
> 1) I had this issue affect 6 servers, spread across 5
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:35:19 -0500, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:54:46PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2017, at 19:36, David King
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response!
> Thats interesting, i don't suppose you have the details of the other
issues?
First
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:54:46PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>
> > On 03 Mar 2017, at 19:36, David King wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the response!
> > Thats interesting, i don't suppose you have the details of the other issues?
>
>
> First report is
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@f
> Am 03.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb David King :
>
> Hi All
>
> Hoping someone will be able to help, we're running a bit of an interesting
> setup
>
> we have 3 HAProxy nodes running freebsd 11.0 , each host runs 4 jails, each
> running haproxy, but only one of the jails is under any real load
>
e're running a bit of an interesting
> > setup
> >
> > we have 3 HAProxy nodes running freebsd 11.0 , each host runs 4 jails, each
> > running haproxy, but only one of the jails is under any real load
> >
>
>
> If my memory does not fail me this is th
one will be able to help, we're running a bit of an
> interesting setup
> >
> > we have 3 HAProxy nodes running freebsd 11.0 , each host runs 4 jails,
> each running haproxy, but only one of the jails is under any real load
> >
>
>
> If my memory does not fail
the jails is under any real load
>
If my memory does not fail me this is third report on haproxy hang on FreeBSD
and all these reports are about FreeBSD-11.
I wonder if any one experiences this issue with FreeBSD-10?
I am running rather heavy loaded haproxy cluster on FreeBSD-10 (versi
Hi All
Hoping someone will be able to help, we're running a bit of an interesting
setup
we have 3 HAProxy nodes running freebsd 11.0 , each host runs 4 jails, each
running haproxy, but only one of the jails is under any real load
we use CARP to balance between the hosts and jails which seems to
Hi John,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:54:20PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
> Hi Willy
>
> Thanks, I'll send future traces to you directly. I understand the hatred of
> bulky email files!
>
> So I think I found the problem but would love your take on it.
>
> Our web applications and services in ou
lto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:15 AM
To: JDzialo John
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org; AZabrecky Allan
Subject: Re: HAProxy Hang during initial connection
Hi John,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:08:27PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Here is a capture of all traffi
Hi John,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:08:27PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Here is a capture of all traffic btwn the two servers using the host option.
Thank you.
> Basically traffic goes from haproxy to a web farm in a round robin fashion.
> These individual web servers are accessi
Hi John,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:03:44PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Our content-length is correct on the header side. This intermittent issue
> happens once in a while. In Fiddler it shows that the client is waiting for
> the right content-length but only gets a fraction of i
Hi John,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> We have been using haproxy and have loved it and appreciate all the hard work
> you have put into this great product.
>
> I am new to the project and still trying to grasp it's complexities so
> forgive me in a
Hi Guys,
We have been using haproxy and have loved it and appreciate all the hard work
you have put into this great product.
I am new to the project and still trying to grasp it's complexities so forgive
me in advance for any ignorance.
We have been running haproxy infront of a web farm since
30 matches
Mail list logo
