ptiste'
Cc: Thierry FOURNIER; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: Load Balancing the Load Balancer
Ok. Thank you. I read and tested little more haproxy. As now I use haproxy to
balance web applications (http/https).
As I can test, for web application load balancing "cookie insert" on a
On 7/18/2015 3:50 AM, mlist wrote:
Ok. Thank you. I read and tested little more haproxy. As now I use haproxy to
balance web applications (http/https).
As I can test, for web application load balancing "cookie insert" on all
haproxy configuration can handle failover as client connect always wit
7 with
kernel 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7
Can you point me in the right direction ?
Roberto
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste [mailto:bed...@gmail.com]
Sent: venerdì 17 luglio 2015 21.25
To: mlist
Cc: Thierry FOURNIER; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Load Balancing the Load Balancer
On Wed, Jul 1
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:14 PM, mlist wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> we see there is a new feature of HAProxy, peer and share table
>>> (sticky-table). This peer feature can be used to have in synch stick cookie
>>> so if one haproxy goes down the other can take over connections ?
>
>
>> Yes, the stick tab
agement of all communication (cookie,
stick, acl, ecc), but for some situation such escape can be usefull.
I hope I'm clear... but this is no so important as now.
Thank you in advance
Roberto
-Original Message-----
From: Thierry FOURNIER [mailto:thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org
alert.org]
> Sent: giovedì 9 luglio 2015 14.51
> To: mlist
> Cc: 'haproxy@formilux.org'
> Subject: Re: Load Balancing the Load Balancer
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:08:58 +
> mlist wrote:
>
> > We have a question about Load Balancing the load balancer... We h
palert.org]
Sent: giovedì 9 luglio 2015 14.51
To: mlist
Cc: 'haproxy@formilux.org'
Subject: Re: Load Balancing the Load Balancer
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:08:58 +
mlist wrote:
> We have a question about Load Balancing the load balancer... We have as now 2
> LVS load ba
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:08:58 +
mlist wrote:
> We have a question about Load Balancing the load balancer... We have as now 2
> LVS load balancer in active / passive configuration with keepalived.
> We want to introduce L7 load balancer (HAProxy) in active / active
> configuration
We have a question about Load Balancing the load balancer... We have as now 2
LVS load balancer in active / passive configuration with keepalived.
We want to introduce L7 load balancer (HAProxy) in active / active
configuration, so we have not only HA configuration but also load balanced
9 matches
Mail list logo
