Re: New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hi Willy, Thank you for your reply. The time schedule is not yet set, but I believe we will require one/two months as this is not high priority on our side at the moment. Since we have confirmed that merging is indeed promising (depending on the quality of the patches), I can give the green

Re: New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hi, On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 06:57:14PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Vasileios Kyrillidis. > > Vasileios Kyrillidis have > written on Fri, 26 May 2017 16:17:48 +0200: > > > Hi Aleksandar, > > > > No patches yet. We wanted confirmation that it has a

Re: New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hi Vasileios Kyrillidis. Vasileios Kyrillidis have written on Fri, 26 May 2017 16:17:48 +0200: > Hi Aleksandar, > > No patches yet. We wanted confirmation that it has a chance of > getting merged before spending the time implementing. We have other >

Re: New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hi Aleksandar, No patches yet. We wanted confirmation that it has a chance of getting merged before spending the time implementing. We have other solutions that we could pursue instead. If merging looks promising we will start working on patches. Cheers, Vasilis On 24/05/17 23:08,

Re: New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hi Vasileios Kyrillidis. Vasileios Kyrillidis have written on Tue, 23 May 2017 18:23:07 +0200: > Hello, > > We would like to add support for decompressing proxyed gziped > requests (i.e. those with "Content-Encoding: gzip") to HAProxy. Would > there be interest in such a feature? i.e. is it

New feature proposal: Add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests

Hello, We would like to add support for decompressing proxyed gziped requests (i.e. those with "Content-Encoding: gzip") to HAProxy. Would there be interest in such a feature? i.e. is it likely it could be accepted into the main repo? Is anyone else already working on such a feature?