Re: Order of acls not important?

Hit Tim, > The ACLs order is not relevant, I recommend to group them all together Thx a lot, it is now working with your advice! Best regards, Stefan

Re: Order of acls not important?

Stefan, Am 15.03.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Stefan Husch|qutic development: > frontend 10.10.10.10_80 >bind 10.10.10.10:80 name 10.10.10.10:80 >mode http >option http-keep-alive >option log-separate-errors >option httplog >acl acl_1 path_beg -i /.well-known/acme-challenge/ >

Re: Order of acls not important?

Hi, Op 15-3-2018 om 21:24 schreef Stefan Husch|qutic development: I thought the acls are processed from 1 to 3, Acl's are evaluated where they are used. What am I doing wrong? Is the acl-position in a haproxy-config not important? Thx, Stefan The order of the acl's themselves is not

Order of acls not important?

Hi, this might be asked before, but I didn´t found the answer yet. The following haproxy.config has the goal to use lets encrypt and https redirect together on a frontend. frontend 10.10.10.10_80 bind 10.10.10.10:80 name 10.10.10.10:80 mode http option http-keep-alive option