Re: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:16:28PM -0600, Coscend@HAProxy wrote: > Thank you for your prompt guidance. Result of your insights: SUCCESS in > loading stats and other pages in both the use cases listed below: > > 1). Removed mailers section in 1.8.0. > > 2). Compiled 1.8-commit 8f42b19

RE: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-28 Thread Coscend@HAProxy
m: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 12:25 PM To: Coscend@HAProxy <haproxy.insig...@coscend.com> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9 Hi Hemant, On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:15:32PM -0600, Coscend@HAP

Re: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Hemant, On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:15:32PM -0600, Coscend@HAProxy wrote: > Thank you for giving time after a large 1.8.0 release to provide us vectors > on testing HAProxy work mode. This community's intensity and laser focus > are a standout. Below is all the information you asked us to

RE: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-28 Thread Coscend@HAProxy
ux.org Subject: Re: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9 Hi Hemant, On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:11:25PM -0600, Coscend@Coscend wrote: > Dear HAProxy community, > > We have been successfully loading Stats page and other applications > via HAProxy 1.7.9. We su

Re: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Hemant, On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:11:25PM -0600, Coscend@Coscend wrote: > Dear HAProxy community, > > We have been successfully loading Stats page and other applications via > HAProxy 1.7.9. We successfully compiled, installed and ran 1.8.0 as a > systemd service. However, with 1.8.0, we

RE: Does HAProxy 1.8.0 need new param vs 1.7.9

2017-11-27 Thread Coscend@HAProxy
Further, we have added the following new parameters in the configuration before testing 1.8.0 [{I} -Baptiste Assman's article]. Still the pages / applications are not accessible via 1.8.0. What obvious thing could we be missing with 1.8.0 installation/configuration vs. 1.7.9? Your vectors to