Re: RFC: HAProxy shared health-check for nbproc > 1

2017-02-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:58:02AM +0530, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Thanks for your comments, I did not realize that this was discussed earlier. > > Let me go through your feedback and get back. Sorry that I am taking time > for this, but this is due to work related

Re: RFC: HAProxy shared health-check for nbproc > 1

2017-02-14 Thread Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
Hi Willy, Thanks for your comments, I did not realize that this was discussed earlier. Let me go through your feedback and get back. Sorry that I am taking time for this, but this is due to work related reasons. Regards - Krishna On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Willy Tarreau

Re: RFC: HAProxy shared health-check for nbproc > 1

2017-02-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Krishna, On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:45:31PM +0530, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Some time back, I had worked on making health checks being done by only > one HAProxy process, and to share this information on a UP/DOWN event to > other processes (tested for 64 processes).

RFC: HAProxy shared health-check for nbproc > 1

2017-02-13 Thread Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
Hi Willy, Some time back, I had worked on making health checks being done by only one HAProxy process, and to share this information on a UP/DOWN event to other processes (tested for 64 processes). Before I finish it completely, I wanted to check with you if this feature is useful. At that time,