There are pros and cons about source IP persistence and source IP
hashing load-balancing.
This is fun cause this morning, I thought it should deserve an article
on my company's blog!
I'll write it today and paste the link here.
Hopefully it will help you.
Baptiste
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:53
Hop, here it is:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2013/04/22/client-ip-persistence-or-source-ip-hash-load-balancing/
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
There are pros and cons about source IP persistence and source IP
hashing load-balancing.
This is fun cause this
Thanks :)
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hop, here it is:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2013/04/22/client-ip-persistence-or-source-ip-hash-load-balancing/
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
There are pros and cons about
Is it possible, with this approach to ‘edit’ the stick table?
For instance, there are certain conditions where I need to move a group of
clients to another server. I’d love to be able to issue a command that updates
this hashtable based on a range of ipaddresses (or some other header
Hi Les,
You may want to try set table statement on HAProxy's socket.
Baptiste
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Les Stroud l...@lesstroud.com wrote:
Is it possible, with this approach to ‘edit’ the stick table?
For instance, there are certain conditions where I need to move a group of
Hi Dan,
Is there a feature in 1.4 to share a sticky table between two or more
instances of haproxy.
Not in 1.4. There is a feature available in 1.5 (-dev) to do this [1].
Regards,
Lukas
[1] http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#3.5
Hi Daniel,
kindly CC the mailing-list, there are a lot of other people who
may be able to help you better than myself.
Would it be possible to use balance source? Is the algorithm deterministic?
If the backend configuration with servers is exactly the same, balance source
may work in that
Would it be possible to use balance source as a crude form of sharing an
IP stick table?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
Is there a feature in 1.4 to share a sticky table between two or more
instances of haproxy.
Not in 1.4. There is a
Is there a feature in 1.4 to share a sticky table between two or more
instances of haproxy. In my situation these instances will run on different
servers but point to the same backend.
-Dan
9 matches
Mail list logo