On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:27:26AM -0400, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Thank you for the response, its interesting that I can't do this with
> haproxy, I was successful in doing this with LVS before.
This is because both work very differently :
- LVS does not inspect contents, it just f
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:10:04 +0200
To: Joseph Hardeman
Cc:
Subject: Re: Source IP instead of Haproxy server IP
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:02:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
They are wanting their systems to send the data back to the visitor instead
of passing it back through haproxy.
Opps, sorry, I
ext set of systems instead of
changing it out for haproxy server IP address.
Thanks again.
Joe
> From: Willy Tarreau
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:10:04 +0200
> To: Joseph Hardeman
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Source IP instead of Haproxy server IP
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:02:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:02:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > They are wanting their systems to send the data back to the visitor instead
> > of passing it back through haproxy.
Opps, sorry, I did not notice the end of the question. It is not
possible to send the data back to the client becau
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:28:49PM -0400, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I got asked if there is a way to make haproxy set the requesting IP it sends
> to the backends to the ip address of the visitor instead of the ip address
> of the haproxy server. I know I can do this with
Hi Guys,
I got asked if there is a way to make haproxy set the requesting IP it sends
to the backends to the ip address of the visitor instead of the ip address
of the haproxy server. I know I can do this with LVS, I did that for
another company several years ago, simply by changing ipv4.ip_forwa
6 matches
Mail list logo
