Hi Willy,
>> Like previsouly suggested by Apollon, we could introduce a flag for
>> statically linking openssl, like we have with PCRE (USE_STATIC_OPENSSL?).
>>
>> If we do that, we could also include -ldl automatically when using that USE
>> flag.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'm a bit hesitant here and a
❦ 30 septembre 2013 13:01 CEST, Apollon Oikonomopoulos :
>> My version of pcre-config (8.30, also tested with 8.31) includes:
>>
>> libS=
>> if test ${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu != /usr/lib ; then
>> libS=-L${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
>> fi
>
> Update:
>
> Debian's 8.31 (testing/unstable
On 13:49 Mon 30 Sep , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 12:19 Mon 30 Sep , Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > For me, pcre-config --libs does not use `-L`. Dunno why this is the
> > case for Apollon.
>
> My version of pcre-config (8.30, also tested with 8.31) includes:
>
> libS=
Hi Vincent,
On 12:19 Mon 30 Sep , Vincent Bernat wrote:
> For me, pcre-config --libs does not use `-L`. Dunno why this is the
> case for Apollon.
My version of pcre-config (8.30, also tested with 8.31) includes:
libS=
if test ${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu != /usr/lib ; then
libS=-L${pref
❦ 30 septembre 2013 11:30 CEST, Willy Tarreau :
>> I would use `pcre-config --libs` and `pcre-config --cflags` instead. The
>> user can still override this on make command line.
>>
>> PCRE_CFLAGS := $(shell pcre-config --cflags)
>> PCRE_LIBS := $(shell pcre-config --libs)
>
> But these would st
Hi Lukas,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:49:41PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Another thing regarding SSL_INC/SSL_LIB: when linking against static openssl,
> libdl is necessary. Previously I did this by appending ADDLIB with -ldl. It
> seems like doing the same in SSL_LIB doesn't work (for me), becaus
Hi Vincent,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:27:30PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ??? 29 septembre 2013 18:30 CEST, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > So maybe we should in fact stop setting PCREDIR to $(pcre-config --prefix),
> > which will result in PCRE_INC/PCRE_LIB remaining silent unless PCREDIR is
> > for
❦ 29 septembre 2013 22:27 CEST, Vincent Bernat :
> LINK = $(LIBTOOL) $(AM_V_lt) --tag=CC $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) \
> $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) --mode=link $(CCLD) $(AM_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) \
> $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
> haproxy: ...
> $(AM_V_CCLD)$(LINK) $(haproxy_OBJECTS) $(haproxy_LD
Hi!
>> I should have spotted that earlier on, it was reported to us as Debian
>> bug #722777 [1] and it's there because of USE_PCRE; when USE_PCRE is
>> enabled, and PCREDIR is not specified, PCRE_LIB will be forced to
>> `pcre-config --prefix`/lib (which 99% of the time will be /usr/lib)
>> and
❦ 29 septembre 2013 18:30 CEST, Willy Tarreau :
> So maybe we should in fact stop setting PCREDIR to $(pcre-config --prefix),
> which will result in PCRE_INC/PCRE_LIB remaining silent unless PCREDIR is
> forced. I suspect the following patch should fix it :
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>
Hi Willy,
On 18:30 Sun 29 Sep , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> That's problematic. The issue was created by the addition of
> pcre-config
> because some people could not build on their systems in the past. The whole
> mess started with the lib64 subdir that broke basically every software
> relying on
Hi Apollon,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:49:41PM +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 13:35 Sun 29 Sep , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Yes, and I have fixed this two weeks ago. The problem is that the
> > "ADDINC"
> > and "ADDLIB" variables are not suited for passing single-compone
Hi Willy. It worked, thanks a lot. Output + build commands are below.
On 2013-09-29 13:35, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm attempting to build HEAD with a statically compiled openssl, and get
the following error:
Hi all,
On 13:35 Sun 29 Sep , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Yes, and I have fixed this two weeks ago. The problem is that the
> "ADDINC"
> and "ADDLIB" variables are not suited for passing single-component paths
> since they suffix everything. Look what it results in your build log :
>
> -lcrypt
Hi Lukas,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi!
>
> (sorry for duplicates, previous mail hit the wire to fast...)
hehe :-)
> > Yes, and I have fixed this two weeks ago. The problem is that the "ADDINC"
> > and "ADDLIB" variables are not suited for passing single-c
Hi!
(sorry for duplicates, previous mail hit the wire to fast...)
> Yes, and I have fixed this two weeks ago. The problem is that the "ADDINC"
> and "ADDLIB" variables are not suited for passing single-component paths
> since they suffix everything. Look what it results in your build log :
>
>
Hi!
> Yes, and I have fixed this two weeks ago. The problem is that the "ADDINC"
> and "ADDLIB" variables are not suited for passing single-component paths
> since they suffix everything. Look what it results in your build log :
>
> -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto -L/usr/lib -Wl,-Bstatic -lpcreposix \
> -
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Julien Vehent wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm attempting to build HEAD with a statically compiled openssl, and get
> the following error:
>
> $ make TARGET=linux2628 USE_STATIC_PCRE=1 USE_OPENSSL=1
> ADDINC=-I/tmp/staticlibssl/include ADDLIB="
Hi Apollon, hi Julien,
> HAProxy's build system does not currently support static linking
> against openssl.
Well the linker should detect that you are pointing the path of a
static-only build of openssl and link it accordingly (no libcrypto.so
there, just a static libcrypto.a file).
> I bet
Hi Julien,
On 10:35 Sat 28 Sep , Julien Vehent wrote:
> On 2013-09-27 21:17, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> >Try stable OpenSSL 1.0.1e, that should work.
>
> I did, and I get the exact same error.
> The problem happens on Debian Squeeze. My laptop on Fedora 19
> doesn't have the issue.
>
HAProxy's b
On 2013-09-27 21:17, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi Julien,
I'm attempting to build HEAD with a statically compiled openssl, and get
the following error:
[...]
$ /tmp/staticlibssl/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev xx XXX
Any idea what could be missing here?
Try stable OpenSSL 1.0.1e, that
Hi Julien,
> I'm attempting to build HEAD with a statically compiled openssl, and get
> the following error:
> [...]
> $ /tmp/staticlibssl/bin/openssl version
> OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev xx XXX
>
> Any idea what could be missing here?
Try stable OpenSSL 1.0.1e, that should work.
Regards,
Lukas
Hi everyone,
I'm attempting to build HEAD with a statically compiled openssl, and get the
following error:
$ make TARGET=linux2628 USE_STATIC_PCRE=1 USE_OPENSSL=1
ADDINC=-I/tmp/staticlibssl/include ADDLIB="-L/tmp/staticlibssl/lib -ldl"
[]
gcc -g -o haproxy src/haproxy.o src/sessionhash.
23 matches
Mail list logo
