Hi Bryan,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:51:04AM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote:
> Sorry for responding in the wrong thread, somehow I'm seeing two threads
> for this (and another) message. Not sure if it's gmail or the list that's
> duplicating threads today.
It's neither, it's kiorky who responded to hi
Sorry for responding in the wrong thread, somehow I'm seeing two threads
for this (and another) message. Not sure if it's gmail or the list that's
duplicating threads today.
-Bryan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Bryan Talbot
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:08 AM, kiorky wrote:
>
>> ju
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:08 AM, kiorky wrote:
> just forgot to include the version: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev25-a339395
> 2014/05/10
>
> On 13/06/2014 10:04, kiorky wrote:
>
> Hi we use here a generator for haproxy configs and this one generates
> amongst all https frontend using SNI to redirect
just forgot to include the version: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev25-a339395
2014/05/10
On 13/06/2014 10:04, kiorky wrote:
> Hi we use here a generator for haproxy configs and this one generates amongst
> all https frontend using SNI to redirect to endspoints.
> Basically, we host lot of VMS and the ho
Hi we use here a generator for haproxy configs and this one generates amongst
all https frontend using SNI to redirect to endspoints.
Basically, we host lot of VMS and the host is NATing/redirecting every served
domain to the underlying VM and when we use https.
In other words, it terminates SSL on
5 matches
Mail list logo
