Re: confusion regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections

2017-10-31 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, 2017-10-31 6:55 GMT+01:00 Baptiste : > hi > > You miss a "maxconn 8000" in your frontend as well. > maxconn in the global section is process-wide, but it does not apply to the > frontend (which is limited to 2000 connections by default). However "maxconn 8000" is the in the default sectio

Re: confusion regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections

2017-10-30 Thread Baptiste
hi You miss a "maxconn 8000" in your frontend as well. maxconn in the global section is process-wide, but it does not apply to the frontend (which is limited to 2000 connections by default). Baptiste On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:58 PM, kushal bhattacharya < bhattacharya.kush...@gmail.com> wrote:

Odp.: confusion regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections

2017-10-28 Thread Walecki, Jakub (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)
regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections Hi, Op 27-10-2017 om 14:58 schreef kushal bhattacharya: Hi, I am confused regarding the readme text ' This is a development version, so it is expected to break from time to time, to add and remove features without prior notificatio

Re: confusion regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections

2017-10-27 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi, Op 27-10-2017 om 14:58 schreef kushal bhattacharya: Hi, I am confused regarding the readme text ' This is a development version, so it is expected to break from time to time, to add and remove features without prior notification and it should not be used in production' .Here I am testing fo

confusion regarding usage of haproxy for large number of connections

2017-10-27 Thread kushal bhattacharya
Hi, I am confused regarding the readme text ' This is a development version, so it is expected to break from time to time, to add and remove features without prior notification and it should not be used in production' .Here I am testing for 8000 connections being distributed to three virtual mqtt b