On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:34:43AM -0500, S Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks Willy.
>
> On the same note you said not to run anything on the same machine, to lower
> costs I want to run other things on the haproxy front-end load balancer.
>
> What are the critical things to watch for on the server so I can
Thanks Willy.
On the same note you said not to run anything on the same machine, to lower
costs I want to run other things on the haproxy front-end load balancer.
What are the critical things to watch for on the server so I can be
notified at what point having 2 things on the server are becoming
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:19:30PM -0500, S Ahmed wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So 500 Mbits is 1/2 usage of a 1 Gbps port (haproxy and the back-end
> servers will have 1 Gbps connections).
No, the traffic goes in opposite directions and the link is full duplex,
so you can effectively have 1 Gbps in and 1 Gbp
Using multiplication:
1500 req/s * 20KBytes * 8 (bits in a Bytes) = 2,4 * 10^8, which is
around 250 Mbits for one way.
This traffic is the traffic from the clients to HAProxy, so you'll
have it twice, since you'll have the same from HAProxy to the servers.
So in total, around 500 Mbits.
cheers
O
how can I calculate if this will work in theory?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You'll need one gig interface (two looks better, one for the frontend
> and one for the backend servers), but it should work without any
> issues.
>
> cheers
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35
Hi,
You'll need one gig interface (two looks better, one for the frontend
and one for the backend servers), but it should work without any
issues.
cheers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> I have a service where people will be http posting documents that will be 20
> KB in size.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
