Re: haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-06-01 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Patrick, On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:37:45AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > Ok, I'm on 1.7.5 and the issue has recurred again. > > Here is `show sess all`: (...) Great, it should help debug the issue. I'm seeing two peers connections here, an incoming one and an outgoing one. The task is not

Re: haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-06-01 Thread Patrick Hemmer
On 2017/5/19 00:35, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:44:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: >> On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote: So on one of my local development

Re: haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-05-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Patrick, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:44:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > > On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > >> So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the > >> CPU at

Re: haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-05-18 Thread Patrick Hemmer
On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote: >> So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the >> CPU at 100% >> `strace -T` on the process just shows: >> >> ... >> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0)

Re: haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-01-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Patrick, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the > CPU at 100% > `strace -T` on the process just shows: > > ... > epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03> > epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0)

haproxy consuming 100% cpu - epoll loop

2017-01-16 Thread Patrick Hemmer
So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the CPU at 100% `strace -T` on the process just shows: ... epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03>