Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:37:45AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> Ok, I'm on 1.7.5 and the issue has recurred again.
>
> Here is `show sess all`:
(...)
Great, it should help debug the issue. I'm seeing two peers connections
here, an incoming one and an outgoing one. The task is not
On 2017/5/19 00:35, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:44:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
So on one of my local development
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:44:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
> On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> >> So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the
> >> CPU at
On 2017/1/17 17:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the
>> CPU at 100%
>> `strace -T` on the process just shows:
>>
>> ...
>> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0)
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:33:44AM +, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the
> CPU at 100%
> `strace -T` on the process just shows:
>
> ...
> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03>
> epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0)
So on one of my local development machines haproxy started pegging the
CPU at 100%
`strace -T` on the process just shows:
...
epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03>
epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03>
epoll_wait(0, {}, 200, 0) = 0 <0.03>
6 matches
Mail list logo