Hi guys,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:41:57PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I see 2 ways of handling this.
1) Move the code that populates the session unique_id member to
http_process_req_common (or to http_wait_for_request
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I see 2 ways of handling this.
1) Move the code that populates the session unique_id member to
http_process_req_common (or to http_wait_for_request where it's
allocated). This will let requests terminated by an `errorfile`
On 2013/08/11 15:45, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I'm using the %rt field in the unique-id-format config parameter
(the full value is %{+X}o%pid-%rt), and am getting lots of
duplicates. In one specific case, haproxy added the same
http_request_counter value to 70 different http requests within a
Oh, for some reason my mail client wasn't showing the response from
Willy when I made this reply. Not sure if this info is really necessary
any more. Will try the patch on that email and report back to it.
-Patrick
On 08/13/2013 07:13 PM, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
On 2013/08/11 15:45, Patrick
4 matches
Mail list logo
